Want to embed a link to this study in your story? This full-text link will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2721248?guestAccessKey=7998323e-6f5b-4d86-9c48-aa294f431c6f
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? This full-text link will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2721248?guestAccessKey=7998323e-6f5b-4d86-9c48-aa294f431c6f
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? This full-text link will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2721242?guestAccessKey=b3b36baf-7ff3-4450-b507-6d426ebdc4bb
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), TUESDAY, JANUARY 22, 2019
Media advisory: To contact study author Norah A. Terrault, M.D., email Scott Maier at scott.maier@ucsf.edu. The full study and invited commentary are linked to this news release.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? This full-text link will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2720757?guestAccessKey=619ceb32-99d0-4da3-9d5f-2aebb18e56a3
Bottom Line: The proportion of liver transplants in the United States for alcohol-associated liver disease increased between 2002 and 2016, with much of the increase associated with a decrease in liver transplant for hepatitis C virus infection because of antiviral therapy. This observational study used data from the United Network for Organ Sharing for all liver transplants during the 15-year period and the national study group consisted of nearly 33,000 patients, including 9,438 patients with a diagnosis of alcohol-associated liver disease. Study findings suggest five-year survival after transplant was lower in patients with alcohol-associated liver disease. Authors suggest the increase in liver transplants for alcohol-associated liver disease may be related to changing attitudes about the length of sobriety needed for a transplant. The study relied on registry data so any conclusions are by association and not causal. Regional differences suggest dissimilar policies for liver transplant for alcohol-associated liver disease.
Authors: Norah A. Terrault, M.D., of the University of California, San Francisco, and coauthors
(doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.6536)
Editor’s Note: The article contains funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or emailmediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), TUESDAY, JANUARY 22, 2019
Media advisory: To contact corresponding author Sean L. Zheng, B.M., B.Ch., M.A., M.R.C.P., email sean.zheng@nhs.net. The full study and editorial are linked to this news release.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? This full-text link will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2721178?guestAccessKey=b6c6e6e2-80a8-449e-9278-a863ceaa9c67
Bottom Line: This study analyzed combined results from 13 randomized clinical trials with more than 164,000 participants to assess aspirin use with the prevention of cardiovascular events and bleeding in people without cardiovascular disease. Results suggest aspirin use was associated with lower risk (absolute risk reduction of 0.38 percent) for cardiovascular events (a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal heart attack and nonfatal stroke) and increased risk of major bleeding (absolute risk increase of 0.47 percent). The role of aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events has remained controversial because of an increased risk for bleeding. This study (a meta-analysis that combines the results of multiple studies identified in a systematic review) is limited by the availability and quality of reported data.
Authors: Sean L. Zheng, B.M., B.Ch., M.A., M.R.C.P., Imperial College London, and Alistair J. Roddick, B.Sc., King’s College London, United Kingdom
(doi:10.1001/jama.2018.20578)
Editor’s Note: Please see the article for additional information, including author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), TUESDAY, JANUARY 22, 2019
Media advisory: To contact corresponding author Marsha Campbell-Yeo, Ph.D., email Terry Murray-Arnold at tmurraya@dal.ca. The full study and editorial are linked to this news release.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? This full-text link will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2721241?guestAccessKey=34c29b3e-c3a2-4648-8f01-47c06c2b67ab
Bottom Line: Neonatal abstinence syndrome describes symptoms (including jitteriness, high-pitched crying, sweating and diarrhea) that primarily occur in newborns exposed to opioids during pregnancy. Finding an optimal drug therapy to treat newborns for neonatal abstinence syndrome may reduce the length of treatment and hospital stay. This study analyzed combined results from 18 randomized clinical trials that included morphine, the standard of care in most hospitals, and other medications to treat newborns for neonatal abstinence syndrome. Buprenorphine was associated with the shortest length of treatment but there were considerable limitations in the findings and a large trial is required for wide-scale adoption.
Author: Marsha Campbell-Yeo, Ph.D., Dalhousie University School of Nursing, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, and coauthors
(doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.5044)
Editor’s Note: The article includes conflict of interest and funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), FRIDAY, JANUARY 18, 2019
Media advisory: To contact corresponding study author Madeline Penn, B.S., B.A., email Michelle Spivak at Michelle.SpivakMelinger@va.gov. The full study, invited commentary and a summary podcast are linked to this news release.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story?: This full-text link will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2720917?guestAccessKey=05b5223a-1756-4852-bd4f-f66f53d44e77
About JAMA Network Open: JAMA Network Open is the new online-only open access general medical journal from the JAMA Network. Every Friday, the journal publishes peer-reviewed clinical research and commentary in more than 40 medical and health subject areas. Every article is free online from the day of publication.
Bottom Line: This study compared new appointment wait times in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system with wait times in the private sector. Wait time data were for primary care, dermatology, cardiology or orthopedics at VA medical centers in 15 major metropolitan areas and private sector comparison data came from a published survey.
Authors: Madeline Penn, B.S., of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, D.C., and coauthors
(doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7096)
Editor’s Note: Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 16, 2019
Media advisory: To contact corresponding author Karen E. Joynt Maddox, M.D., M.P.H., email Diane Williams at williamsdia@wustl.edu. The full study is linked to this news release.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? This full-text link will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/2720425?guestAccessKey=b464ef40-d3a5-48c5-85d1-3f2e0c2f8060
Bottom Line: Lack of insurance is associated with worse care and outcomes among adults hospitalized for a heart attack. It is unclear whether states that expanded Medicaid eligibility under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act in 2014 had an associated improvement in quality of care and outcomes among low-income patients hospitalized with a heart attack. This observational study included 325,000 patients younger than 65 who had been hospitalized for a heart attack and found that state Medicaid expansion was associated with a significant reduction in rates of uninsurance among these patients. Quality of care and outcomes, such as risk of death and a prolonged hospital stay, didn’t improve among low-income adults in expansion states compared with nonexpansion states. The registry used in this study enrolls patients who may not necessarily be representative of all hospitals in the U.S.
Authors: Karen E. Joynt Maddox, M.D., M.P.H., Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, and coauthors.
(doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2018.4577)
Editor’s Note: The article includes conflict of interest disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), FRIDAY, JANUARY 18, 2019
Media advisory: To contact corresponding study author Scott E. Hadland, M.D., M.P.H., M.S., email Jenny Eriksen at jenny.eriksen@bmc.org. The full study, invited commentary and a summary podcast are linked to this news release and a visual abstract is below.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story?: This full-text links will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2720914?guestAccessKey=630f38c9-ac45-406f-8764-b04eef425ce7
About JAMA Network Open: JAMA Network Open is the new online-only open access general medical journal from the JAMA Network. Every Friday, the journal publishes peer-reviewed clinical research and commentary in more than 40 medical and health subject areas. Every article is free online from the day of publication.
Bottom Line: This study examined the association between pharmaceutical company marketing of opioids to physicians and subsequent death from prescription opioid overdoses across U.S. counties. The study, which analyzed industry marketing information data and national data on opioid prescribing and overdose deaths, reports almost $40 million in opioid marketing was targeted to more than 67,500 physicians across more than 2,200 counties from August 2013 to December 2015. Increases in opioid marketing to physicians were associated with higher prescribing rates and subsequently more death from prescription opioid overdoses a year later in this analysis. This observational study can show only associations, not causation. Findings suggest opioid marketing to physicians may counter national efforts to reduce the number of opioids prescribed and policymakers might consider limits on those activities.
Authors: Scott E. Hadland, M.D., M.P.H., M.S., Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, and coauthors
(doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6007)
Editor’s Note: The article contains conflict of interest and funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 16, 2019
Media advisory: To contact corresponding author John S. Barbieri, M.D., M.B.A., email John Infanti at John.Infanti@pennmedicine.upenn.edu. The full study, an editorial and a podcast are linked to this news release.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? Link will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamadermatology/fullarticle/2720317?guestAccessKey=c0fe3bc7-c5b7-483f-9d05-1b97041a4aa3
Bottom Line: This study looked at trends over time in oral antibiotic prescribing by dermatologists using commercial insurance claims data for almost 986,000 courses of oral antibiotics prescribed by nearly 12,000 dermatologists. Overall, between 2008 and 2016, there was a decrease in antibiotic prescribing (from 3.36 to 2.13 courses per 100 visits with a dermatologist) and much of that decline came from a decrease in extended courses of antibiotics prescribed for acne and rosacea. However, prescribing of postoperative antibiotics after surgical visits increased (from 3.92 to 6.65 courses per 100 visits) and researchers suggest that practice be evaluated. The possibility of misclassification of diagnoses related to antibiotic prescriptions exists in this observational study.
Authors: John S. Barbieri, M.D., M.B.A., of the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, and coauthors
(doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.4944)
Editor’s Note: The article contains funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
Listen to an interview with Erica S. Shenoy, M.D., Ph.D., of Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, co-author of the JAMA study, “Evaluation and Management of Penicillin Allergy.” The podcast is available for listening and download on this page.
A summary video and visual abstract are available on this page for the study, “Effect of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation on 8-Week Remission in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis,” by Samuel P. Costello, M.B.B.S., Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, Australia, and coauthors. The video can be embedded on your website by copying and pasting the HTML code below. To download the video, email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org for information.
Video embed code:
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), MONDAY, JANUARY 14, 2019
Media Advisory: To contact corresponding author Lorena Fernández de la Cruz, Ph.D., email lorena.fernandez.de.la.cruz@ki.se. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
To place an electronic embedded link in your story: Links will be live at the embargo time: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaneurology/fullarticle/2719821?guestAccessKey=5b33b76d-7aac-4efd-8142-038da2293ace
Bottom Line: An observational study of people living in Sweden suggests a diagnosis of Tourette syndrome or chronic tic disorder was associated with higher risk of a cardiometabolic disorder. Among more than 14 million people living in Sweden between 1973 and 2013, about 7,800 had a registered diagnosis of Tourette syndrome or chronic tic disorder. The risk of a cardiometabolic disorder was higher than in the general population or among siblings without Tourette syndrome or chronic tic disorder. The study group doesn’t represent all Swedish patients with Tourette syndrome or chronic tic disorder because some with mild tics don’t seek care and others diagnosed by nonspecialists weren’t included.
Authors: Lorena Fernández de la Cruz, Ph.D., of the Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, and coauthors
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.4279)
Editor’s Note: The article includes conflict of interest and funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), MONDAY, JANUARY 14, 2019
Media advisory: To contact study author John W. Ayers, Ph.D., M.A., email ayers.john.w@gmail.com. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? Link will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2720125?guestAccessKey=f419264c-db4b-41bb-87a3-ce20c7c487c3
Bottom Line: The national helpline 800-662-HELP is the only free, federally managed and endorsed U.S. addiction treatment referral service. This study examined public awareness of this important resource. Researchers looked at engagement and public awareness of the helpline on Google, Google News and Twitter in the week after singer Demi Lovato was hospitalized for an overdose in July 2018. They compared engagement and awareness with that of the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline (800-273-TALK) in the week after celebrity chef Anthony Bourdain’s suicide in June 2018. The table below details engagement of the two helplines. The results suggest the substance abuse helpline 800-662-HELP appears to be underappreciated in the media (they should be encouraged to include it in stories on addiction) and by the public at large (social media and internet search companies could help promote it).
Authors: John W. Ayers, Ph.D., M.A., of the University of California, San Diego, and coauthors
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.6562)
Editor’s Note:Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or emailmediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), MONDAY, JANUARY 14, 2019
Media advisory: To contact corresponding author Jaclyn Hall, Ph.D., email Douglas Bennett at dougbennett@ufl.edu. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? Link will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2721000?guestAccessKey=737e41bf-2442-4e6b-93a2-8e18dc2fb368
Bottom Line: Smoking during pregnancy is a leading preventable cause of adverse birth outcomes, including preterm birth, low birth weight and poor lung function. This study looked at whether change in the number of stores selling tobacco products in six Southeast states (Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee) was associated with change in rates of smoking during pregnancy. The number of tobacco retailers in the Southeast increased by about 8,300 in 2012-2013 when Family Dollar and Dollar General started selling tobacco products; then decreased in 2014 by about 2,500 when the CVS pharmacy chain discontinued tobacco sales. Researchers found rates of smoking during pregnancy decreased 15.6 percent across the six-state region between 2011-2012 and 2015-2016 but contrasting policy changes by tobacco retailers led to an overall increase in tobacco retailer density of one additional store per 10,000 adults. Rates went down less in areas where there were more stores. Increased retail availability of tobacco products may be inhibiting progress in reducing smoking.
Author: Jaclyn Hall, Ph.D., University of Florida, Gainesville, and coauthors
Related Material: Also available on this page for listening and downloading, an interview with study coauthor Jaclyn Hall, Ph.D.
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.4598)
Editor’s Note: Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), TUESDAY, JANUARY 15, 2019
Media advisory: To contact corresponding author Richard K. Burt, M.D., email Marla Paul at marla-paul@northwestern.edu. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? Link will be live at the embargo time: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.2018.18743
Bottom Line: In a randomized clinical trial, researchers compared the effect of a stem cell transplant using a non-myeloablative regimen (a lower-dose, short course of more tolerable immune specific chemotherapy and antibodies to suppress the immune system) versus continuing disease-modifying therapy in 110 patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. The primary outcome was disease progression and other outcomes included neurologic disability, quality of life, time to relapse and no evidence of disease activity. The stem cell transplant was better than continued drug therapy for patients with frequent relapses and moderate disability. Further studies are needed to replicate the findings of this preliminary study.
Authors: Richard K. Burt, M.D., Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, and coauthors.
Visual Abstract
Related Material
The following related elements from the JAMA Network are also available on the For The Media website:
— The JAMA study, “Association of Initial Disease-Modifying Therapy With Later Conversion to Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis,” by Tomas Kalincik, Ph.D., Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia, and coauthors.
— The JAMA editorial, “Stem Cell Transplantation to Treat Multiple Sclerosis,” by Harold Atkins, M.D., F.R.C.P.C., of the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jama.2018.18743)
Editor’s Note: The article includes funding/support and conflict of interest disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 9, 2019
Media advisory: To contact corresponding author Yssra S. Soliman, B.A., email Elaine Iandoli at elaine.iandoli@einstein.yu.edu. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? Link will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamadermatology/fullarticle/10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.4813
Bottom Line: The specialty of dermatology is one of the least diverse medical fields. In this study, a survey was conducted among 155 medical students (58 percent of whom were nonwhite) to understand perceived barriers to pursuing a career in dermatology by minority medical students. Major barriers cited by minority students included the lack of diversity in dermatology; perceived negative perceptions of minority students by residency programs, such as expecting lower performance; socioeconomic factors, such as lack of loan forgiveness; and a lack of mentors. The findings highlight the need to actively recruit and mentor students of all backgrounds. The survey respondents may not be representative of all U.S. medical students.
Authors: Yssra S. Soliman, B.A., Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, and coauthors
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.4813)
Editor’s Note: Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), TUESDAY, JANUARY 8, 2019
Media advisory: To contact corresponding author Steven Woloshin, M.D., M.S., email Paige Stein at Paige.Stein@dartmouth.edu. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? Link will be live at the embargo time: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.2018.19320
Bottom Line: The amount of money spent on medical marketing has increased substantially in the United States over the last two decades. An analysis estimates spending on medical marketing of drugs, disease awareness campaigns, health services and laboratory testing increased to $29.9 billion in 2016 from $17.7 billion in 1997. Most of the 2016 spending ($20.3 billion) was on marketing to professionals, while direct-to-consumer advertising grew to $9.6 billion. Regulatory oversight remains limited despite the increase in spending on marketing. This study may underestimate the amount of spending on medical marketing because some data are unavailable. The analysis was done with data and information from various sources, including the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Authors: Lisa M. Schwartz, M.D., M.S., and Steven Woloshin, M.D., M.S., Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
Related Material: The following are also available on the For The Media website.
The Editor’s Note, “A Tribute to Lisa M. Schwartz, M.D., M.S.,” by Howard Bauchner, M.D., Editor in Chief, JAMA.
The editorial, “Medical Marketing, Trust, and the Patient-Physician Relationship,” by Selena E. Ortiz, Ph.D., M.P.H., Pennsylvania State University, University Park, and Meredith B. Rosenthal, Ph.D., Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston.
The editorial, “Medical Marketing in the United States – A Truly Special Communication,” by Howard Bauchner, M.D., Editor in Chief, JAMA, and Phil B. Fontanarosa, M.D., M.B.A., Executive Editor, JAMA.
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jama.2018.19320)
Editor’s Note: The article includes conflict of interest disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), MONDAY, JANUARY 7, 2019
Media advisory: To contact study author Hongying Dai, Ph.D., email Lisa Spellman at lspellman@unmc.edu. The full study is available on the For The Media website. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? Link will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.4595
Bottom Line: Self-reported use of flavored tobacco products by middle and high school students decreased from 2014 to 2016 but climbed back up in 2017 in an analysis of national survey data. Flavored noncigarette tobacco products are widely available in the U.S. This study examined changes in self-reported use of flavored tobacco products by youth who use tobacco. The analysis included more than 78,0000 students from a combined 2014 to 2017 national school-based annual survey. The use of any tobacco product dropped from 17.3 percent in 2014 to 13.6 percent in 2017. While the use of flavored tobacco products by those who use tobacco decreased from 69.4 percent in 2014 to 57.7 percent in 2016, it increased again to 63.6 percent between 2016-2017 and much of that appears due to flavor use in electronic cigarettes.
Authors: Hongying Dai, PhD, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska, Omaha.
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.4595)
Editor’s Note: The article includes funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), FRIDAY, JANUARY 4, 2019
Media advisory: To contact corresponding study author Gideon Koren, M.D., email gidiup_2000@yahoo.com. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story?: Links will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6643
About JAMA Network Open: JAMA Network Open is the new online-only open access general medical journal from the JAMA Network. Every Friday, the journal publishes peer-reviewed clinical research and commentary in more than 40 medical and health subject areas. Every article is free online from the day of publication.
Bottom Line: Holocaust survivors had higher rates of chronic conditions but lower rates of death than a comparison group of individuals insured by the same healthcare services organization in Israel. Biological and psychosocial reasons that may help to explain the findings need more study but researchers suggest unique characteristics of resilience among Holocaust survivors and better health literacy may be among the possibilities. This observational study included more than 38,000 Holocaust survivors in Israel who were born between 1911 and 1945 in Europe and nearly 35,000 people in a control group born in Israel during those same years. Both groups were insured by Maccabi Healthcare Services in Israel. The study used data collected from 1998 through 2017 and looked at heart disease, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, osteoporosis, diabetes, hypertension, cancer and death.
Authors: Gideon Koren, M.D., of Maccabi Healthcare Services, Tel Aviv, Israel, and coauthors
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6643)
Editor’s Note: Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), FRIDAY, JANUARY 4, 2019
Media advisory: To contact corresponding author Jakob Christensen, M.D., Ph.D., Dr.Med.Sci., email jakob@farm.au.dk. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story?: Link will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6606
About JAMA Network Open: JAMA Network Open is the new online-only open access general medical journal from the JAMA Network. Every Friday, the journal publishes peer-reviewed clinical research and commentary in more than 40 medical and health subject areas. Every article is free online from the day of publication.
Bottom Line: This study examined whether prenatal exposure to valproate and other antiepileptic drugs was associated with increased risk of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children. More than 913,000 children in Denmark were included in the observational study, and exposure to antiepileptic drugs was defined as pregnancies where mothers redeemed one or more prescriptions for the medications. In total, 580 children were identified as having been exposed to valproate during pregnancy and, of them, 49 (8.4 percent) had ADHD; among more than 912,000 children not exposed to valproate about 29,000 (3.2 percent) had ADHD. The study used registry data and it is not known whether the women used the medication and how much was actually taken. The absolute 15-year risk of ADHD in children exposed to valproate in pregnancy was higher than those not exposed to the drug. There were no associations found between other antiepileptic drugs in the study and ADHD.
Authors: Jakob Christensen, M.D., Ph.D., Dr.Med.Sci., Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark, and coauthors
Related Material: The commentary, “Fetal Valproate Exposure and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder,” by Kimford J. Meador, M.D., Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, is also available on the For The Media website.
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6606)
Editor’s Note: The article includes conflict of interest and funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or emailmediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), FRIDAY, DECEMBER 28, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding study author Richard E. Tremblay, Ph.D., email richard.ernest.tremblay@umontreal.ca. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story?: Links will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6364
About JAMA Network Open: JAMA Network Open is the new online-only open access general medical journal from the JAMA Network. Every Friday, the journal publishes peer-reviewed clinical research and commentary in more than 40 medical and health subject areas. Every article is free online from the day of publication.
Bottom Line: Children can exhibit physical aggression when they are very young but that behavior typically declines before and during elementary school. However, a small proportion of children have atypically high physical aggression problems into adolescence, which may put them at increased risk for violent crime, social maladjustment, and alcohol and drug abuse. This observational study of 2,223 boys and girls used information from mothers, teachers and the children to trace the development of physical aggression problems from infancy to adolescence. The analysis suggests the frequency of physical aggression increased from age 1½ to 3½ and then decreased until age 13. Trajectories for the development of physical aggression differed for boys and girls, and several risk factors were identified, including family characteristics when the child was an infant such as having parents with lower education and higher depression, lower socioeconomic status and a higher number of siblings. Interventions during pregnancy and early childhood may help to prevent high physical aggression in children in high-risk families.
Authors: Richard E. Tremblay, Ph.D., University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, and coauthors
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6364)
Editor’s Note: The article contains funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), FRIDAY, DECEMBER 28, 2018
Media Advisory: To contact corresponding author Kimberley J. Smith, Ph.D., email kimberley.j.smith@surrey.ac.uk. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
To place an electronic embedded link in your story: Links will be live at the embargo time: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaneurology/fullarticle/10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.4147
Bottom Line: While cerebral palsy is considered a pediatric condition because it develops and is diagnosed in early childhood, it is a lifelong condition with the majority of children living into adulthood. Little research exists on the mental health of adults with cerebral palsy. This study included 1,700 adults 18 years or older with cerebral palsy and 5,100 adults without cerebral palsy. Those adults with cerebral palsy without an intellectual disability had a higher risk of developing depression and anxiety. The study relied on diagnostic codes for outcomes.
Authors: Kimberley J. Smith, Ph.D., University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom, and coauthors
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.4147)
Editor’s Note: The article includes funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), FRIDAY, DECEMBER 28, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding study author Alexander J. Butwick, M.B.B.S., F.R.C.A., M.S., email Erin Digitale at digitale@stanford.edu. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story?: Links will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6567
About JAMA Network Open: JAMA Network Open is the new online-only open access general medical journal from the JAMA Network. Every Friday, the journal publishes peer-reviewed clinical research and commentary in more than 40 medical and health subject areas. Every article is free online from the day of publication.
Bottom Line: Pain relief for pregnant women in labor is commonly given in the form of epidural, spinal or combined spinal-epidural blockade, which is collectively referred to as neuraxial analgesia. This study used birth certificate data and found wide variation in neuraxial analgesia use across the United States. Among 2.6 million pregnant women who underwent labor in 2015, neuraxial analgesia was used by 73 percent, with the lowest frequency in Maine and the highest in Nevada. Variation between states was only partly explained by state-level factors, which suggests other unmeasured patient-level and hospital-level factors likely were at play. It’s important to understand the main reasons behind the variation and to know whether it influences health outcomes for women and newborns.
Authors: Alexander J. Butwick, M.B.B.S., F.R.C.A., M.S., Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, and coauthors
Visual Abstract:
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6567)
Editor’s Note: The article contains conflict of interest and funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), THURSDAY, DECEMBER 27, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding author Farhad lslami, M.D., Ph.D., email David Sampson at david.sampson@cancer.org. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? Link will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaoncology/fullarticle/10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.5639
Bottom Line: Extra body weight is associated with cancer. This study used data from several sources to examine cancer cases attributed to excess weight among adults 30 or older in 50 states and the District of Columbia. Each year from 2011 to 2015, an estimated 38,000 cases of cancer in men and 75,000 in women were attributed to extra body weight. That excess weight accounted for at least 1 in 17 of all new cancers in each state. The proportion of cancer cases varied among states, with the highest proportions found in several Southern and Midwestern states, Alaska and the District of Columbia. The study has some limitations, including that proportions for some cancer types in less populated states are based on a small number of cases.
Authors: Farhad lslami, M.D., Ph.D., American Cancer Society, Atlanta, and coauthors
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.5639)
Editor’s Note: The article includes conflict of interest and funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), FRIDAY, DECEMBER 28, 2018
Media advisory: To contact study author Adil Haider, M.D., M.P.H., email Johanna Younghans at jyounghans@bwh.harvard.edu. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story?: Links will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6506
About JAMA Network Open: JAMA Network Open is the new online-only open access general medical journal from the JAMA Network. Every Friday, the journal publishes peer-reviewed clinical research and commentary in more than 40 medical and health subject areas. Every article is free online from the day of publication.
Bottom Line: Emergency department patients who are sexual or gender minorities reported greater satisfaction when information on sexual and gender identity was collected on forms during registration instead of by nurses who asked about it during the visit. Understanding patient preferences for collecting this information is important because health care disparities exist for sexual and gender minority patients (including lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender identities) but the extent of those disparities is not known because of a lack of routine collection of information about sexual and gender identity from patients. This observational study analyzed survey data from 540 emergency department. It is unclear if these findings can be generalized to medical settings outside the emergency department.
Authors: Adil Haider, M.D., M.P.H., Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, and coauthors
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6506)
Editor’s Note: The article contains conflict of interest and funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or emailmediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), FRIDAY, DECEMBER 28, 2018
Media advisory: To contact study author David L. Brown, M.D., email Diane Duke Williams at Williamsdia@wustl.edu. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story?: Links will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6383
About JAMA Network Open: JAMA Network Open is the new online-only open access general medical journal from the JAMA Network. Every Friday, the journal publishes peer-reviewed clinical research and commentary in more than 40 medical and health subject areas. Every article is free online from the day of publication.
Bottom Line: Having seven or fewer alcoholic drinks a week was associated with increased survival in older adults with newly diagnosed heart failure compared with patients who abstained from alcohol after accounting for other potential mitigating factors. Conflicting data exist about an association between alcohol consumption and heart failure but not much is known about the safety of alcohol consumption in patients after a new diagnosis of heart failure. This observational study of 393 patients suggests limited alcohol consumption of seven drinks a week or fewer was associated with an additional average survival of just over one year at 383 days compared with abstinence from alcohol. Survival after a new diagnosis of heart failure was about 7.5 years among patients in the study. Researchers didn’t have information about the cause of heart failure in these patients. Optimal levels of alcohol consumption by adults with heart failure remain to be determined. These results should not be interpreted as suggesting that individuals with newly diagnosed heart failure show begin drinking alcohol after their diagnosis if they did not drink previously.
Authors: David L. Brown, M.D., Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, and coauthors
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6383)
Editor’s Note: The article contains conflict of interest and funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or emailmediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), FRIDAY, DECEMBER 28, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding author Julie R. Gaither, Ph.D., M.P.H., R.N., email julie.gaither@yale.edu or Ziba Kashef at Ziba.kashef@yale.edu. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story?: Links will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6558
About JAMA Network Open: JAMA Network Open is the new online-only open access general medical journal from the JAMA Network. Every Friday, the journal publishes peer-reviewed clinical research and commentary in more than 40 medical and health subject areas. Every article is free online from the day of publication.
Bottom Line: Nearly 9,000 children and adolescents died from opioid poisonings with prescription and illicit drugs between 1999 and 2016 based on an analysis of national data. The death rate almost tripled over that time to nearly 1 per 100,000 based on the data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prescription opioids were implicated in 73 percent of the deaths (6,561) and most of the deaths were unintentional (nearly 81 percent). The majority of deaths were among non-Hispanic white males but over time non-Hispanic black children accounted for a larger proportion of the deaths. The highest annual death rates during the 18 years examined in the study were among teens 15 to 19, with heroin implicated in nearly 1,900 deaths. The study relied on data from death certificates so the potential for misclassification of cause and manner of death exists. Researchers urge lawmakers, public health officials, clinicians and parents to implement protective measures to address the growing public health problem.
Authors: Julie R. Gaither, Ph.D., M.P.H., R.N., Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, and coauthors
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6558)
Editor’s Note: The article includes conflict of interest and funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or emailmediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), FRIDAY, DECEMBER 21, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding author Lucio C. Rovati, M.D., email lucio.rovati@unimib.it. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? Link will be live at the embargo time: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.2018.19319
Bottom Line: Managing osteoarthritis requires long-term treatment for symptoms such as pain and changes in joint structure that can lead to disability. This study analyzed the combined results of 47 randomized clinical trials that lasted at least 12 months for 33 drug interventions and 22,000 patients with knee osteoarthritis. Researchers report uncertainty around the long-term effectiveness of medications to control pain for patients with knee osteoarthritis, including the two medications that were associated with improved pain (celecoxib and glucosamine sulfate). Large randomized clinical trials are needed to resolve questions regarding long-term pain control.
Authors: Lucio C. Rovati, M.D., University of Milano – Bicocca, Monza, Italy, and coauthors
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jama.2018.19319)
Editor’s Note: The article includes conflict of interest and funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), FRIDAY, DECEMBER 21, 2018
Media advisory: To contact study author John W. Ayers, Ph.D., M.A., email ayers.john.w@gmail.com. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? Links will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5094
Bottom Line: An estimated 40 to 54 million Google searches for sexual harassment and assault were recorded in the United States in the eight months after public accusations against film producer Harvey Weinstein and the ensuing #MeToo movement. Searches related to reporting and preventing such actions also were up based on the results of a study that monitored and analyzed search activity.
Authors: John W. Ayers, Ph.D., M.A., of the University of California, San Diego, and coauthors
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5094)
Editor’s Note: The article contains funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or emailmediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), FRIDAY, DECEMBER 21, 2018
Media advisory: To contact study author Oanh Kieu Nguyen, M.D., M.A.S., email Peter Farley at Peter.Farley@ucsf.edu. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? Links will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5866
Bottom Line: A unique opportunity made it feasible for uninsured patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who received emergency-only dialysis in Dallas, Texas, to enroll in private, commercial health insurance plans in 2015 and that made it possible for researchers to compare scheduled vs. emergency-only dialysis among undocumented immigrants with ESRD. This observational study included 181 undocumented immigrants, 105 of whom received insurance coverage and enrolled in scheduled dialysis and 76 of whom remained uninsured. Regularly scheduled dialysis (the standard of care for ESRD) compared with emergency-only dialysis (administered when a patient becomes life-threateningly ill) was associated with reductions in mortality, health care utilization and costs among patients with ESRD. The authors call for scheduled dialysis to be the standard of care for any patient with ESRD in the United States.
Authors: Oanh Kieu Nguyen, M.D., M.A.S., of the University of California, San Francisco, and coauthors
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5866)
Editor’s Note: The article contains funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or emailmediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), FRIDAY, DECEMBER 21, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding author Robert W. Yeh, M.D., M.Sc., email Lindsey Diaz-MacInnis at ldiaz2@bidmc.harvard.edu. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? Link will be live at the embargo time: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.2018.19232
Bottom Line: The Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP) was created under the Affordable Care Act and hospitals face financial penalties for higher-than-expected 30-day readmission rates for patients with heart failure, heart attack and pneumonia. Lower hospital readmission rates for those conditions have been associated with the program but it was unclear if the program was associated with a change in patient deaths. This observational study included 8 million Medicare hospitalizations for heart failure, heart attack and pneumonia before and after HRRP was implemented. Study results suggest implementation of the HRRP was associated with an increase in deaths within 30 days after discharge for hospitalization for heart failure and pneumonia but not for heart attack. More research is needed to understand if the increase in 30-day postdischarge mortality is a result of the program, considering a lack of association with mortality within 45 days of hospital admission.
Authors: Robert W. Yeh, M.D., M.Sc., Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, and coauthors
Related Material: The editorial, “Unintended Harm Associated With the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program,” by Gregg C. Fonarow, M.D., Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, is also available on the For The Media website.
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jama.2018.19232)
Editor’s Note: The article includes conflict of interest and funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: DECEMBER 19, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding author Julia A. Dilley, Ph.D., M.E.S., email Kate Willson at kate.willson@multco.us. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? Link will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.4458
Bottom Line: Washington state legalized retail marijuana for adults 21 and older in 2012. Understanding how this change affects teens is important. This study assessed whether findings about marijuana use by young people in a Washington state-based youth survey were consistent with findings from a nationally representative survey. An analysis of the two surveys of students in the eighth, 10th and 12th grades finds differing results on whether marijuana use has increased or decreased among teens. The results of one survey suggest use declined after legalization among eighth and 10th graders; the other survey suggests an increase in use among 10th graders. Neither survey showed changes in use among 12th graders. Differences between the surveys in design and methods may explain the findings.
Author: Julia A. Dilley, Ph.D., M.E.S., Multnomah County/Oregon Public Health Division, Portland, and coauthors
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.4458)
Editor’s Note: The article includes funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), FRIDAY, DECEMBER 21, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding study author Daniel M. Tomaszewski, Pharm.D., Ph.D., email Bethanie Le at bele@chapman.edu. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story?: Links will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6161
About JAMA Network Open: JAMA Network Open is the new online-only open access general medical journal from the JAMA Network. Every Friday, the journal publishes peer-reviewed clinical research and commentary in more than 40 medical and health subject areas. Every article is free online from the day of publication.
Bottom Line: Opioids for pain management in pediatric patients are sometimes necessary but their use has raised concerns about the effects of opioids and later abuse. This analysis examined opioid prescribing rates using information from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey from 2006 to 2015 on more than 69,000 emergency department visits for patients younger than 18. Prescribing rates decreased from 8.2 percent in 2006–2010 to 6.3 percent in 2011–2015. Prescribing seemed to vary by region of the country, race, age and payment. For example, opioid prescribing rates were higher in the West; white patients and patients 13 to 17 were more likely to get prescriptions; and patients using Medicaid were less likely to get opioid prescriptions. The results of this observational study suggest inconsistencies in opioid prescribing requiring further research.
Authors: Daniel M. Tomaszewski, Pharm.D., Ph.D., Chapman University, Irvine, California, and coauthors
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6161)
Editor’s Note: The article contains funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), FRIDAY, DECEMBER 21, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding study author Eli S. Rosenberg, Ph.D., email Kelsey Butz at kebutz@albany.edu. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story?: Links will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6371
About JAMA Network Open: JAMA Network Open is the new online-only open access general medical journal from the JAMA Network. Every Friday, the journal publishes peer-reviewed clinical research and commentary in more than 40 medical and health subject areas. Every article is free online from the day of publication.
Bottom Line: Hepatitis C virus infection is a major cause of illness and death in the United States and injection drug use is likely fueling many new cases. This study, which used survey and vital statistics data, suggests about 1 percent of adults (0.93 percent) were living with hepatitis C from 2013 to 2016, and how common infections were varied by state and region. Nine states accounted for about 52 percent of all people living with hepatitis C (California, Texas, Florida, New York, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Tennessee and North Carolina). The highest rates of infection were frequently in states heavily impacted by the opioid crisis, with 5 of 9 states with the highest number of hepatitis C infections in the Appalachian region. The results of this observational study could help to guide state-level prevention and treatment efforts because the resources necessary will vary by jurisdiction.
Authors: Eli S. Rosenberg, Ph.D., University at Albany School of Public Health, State University of New York, Rensselaer, New York, and coauthors
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6371)
Editor’s Note: The article contains conflict of interest and funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
Listen to an interview with Robert A. Tessler, M.D., M.P.H., and Frederick P Rivara, M.D., M.P.H., co-authors of the JAMA Surgery study, “Trends in Firearm Injury and Motor Vehicle Crash Case Fatality by Age Group, 2003-2013.” The podcast is available for listening and download on this page.
Visual Abstract
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), THURSDAY, DECEMBER 20, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding author Keisuke Kawata, Ph.D., email April Toler at artoler@iu.edu. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? Link will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaophthalmology/fullarticle/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.6193
Bottom Line: Head impacts in youth sports, even when they don’t cause symptoms of concussion, are a public health concern because these so-called subconcussive head impacts may result in long-term neurological issues if they are sustained repeatedly. This study looked at changes in measurements of near point of convergence (NPC), which is the distance from your eyes to where both eyes can focus without double vision, in 12 high school football players at 14 different times during a season. The NPC measurement matters because it has been shown to detect damage to neurons before symptoms appear. The frequency and magnitude of head impacts from all practices and games also were measured. Study findings suggest NPC values worsened with subconcussive head impacts, and that impaired NPC didn’t rapidly recover. However, NPC values began to return to normal in midseason while players continued to incur head impacts, suggesting the system controlling eye movements may develop tolerance to recurrent subconcussive head impacts. The findings of this study may not be generalized because of its small size.
Author: Keisuke Kawata, Ph.D., Indiana University, Bloomington, and coauthors
Related Material: The commentary, “Assessing Subconcussive Head Impacts in Athletes Playing Contact Sports – The Eyes Have It,” by Ann C. McKee, M.D., and Michael L. Alosco, Ph.D., of the Boston University School of Medicine, is also available on the For The Media website.
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.6193)
Editor’s Note: The article includes conflict of interest and funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), MONDAY, DECEMBER 17, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding author Melissa A. Bright, Ph.D., email mbright@coe.ufl.edu. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? Link will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.4346
Bottom Line: This study used a complex method to analyze report card release dates and cases of child physical abuse called into a hotline and verified by Florida’s child welfare agency for elementary school children during an academic year. In an analysis that included 1,943 cases of verified child physical abuse, calls that resulted in verified cases came in at a higher rate on Saturdays when report cards were released on Fridays. Possible reasons to explain why are speculative and require further study. The study is limited by its focus only on public school data and data only on physical abuse that resulted in calls to a state hotline.
Authors: Melissa A. Bright, Ph.D., of the University of Florida, Gainesville, and coauthors
Related Material: The editorial, “Corporal Punishment and Children’s Report Cards – Failing Our Children,” by Antoinette L. Laskey, M.D., M.P.H., M.B.A., of the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, also is available on the For The Media website.
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.4346)
Editor’s Note: The article contains funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), TUESDAY, DECEMBER 18, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding author Jason W. Busse, D.C., Ph.D., email Veronica McGuire at vmcguir@mcmaster.ca. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? Link will be live at the embargo time: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.2018.18472
Bottom Line: An estimated 50 million adults in the United States were living with chronic noncancer pain in 2016 and many of them were prescribed opioid medications, even though a clinical benefit is uncertain. This study combined the results of 96 randomized clinical trials with about 26,000 participants to compare opioids with placebo and nonopioid alternative pain medications for the treatment of chronic noncancer pain. Opioids were associated with small improvements in pain and physical functioning plus increased risk of vomiting compared with placebo. Comparisons of opioids with nonopioid pain medication alternatives suggest the benefit for pain and functioning may be similar but the quality of evidence from the studies wasn’t high. None of the studies provided rates of developing opioid use disorder.
Authors: Jason W. Busse, D.C., Ph.D., McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, and coauthors
Related Material
The following related elements from the JAMA Network are also available on the For The Media website:
A summary video for this study is available to view on this page and to embed on your website by copying and pasting the HTML code below. To download the video, email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org for information.
The JAMA editorial, “Increasing Evidence for the Limited Role of Opioids to Treat Chronic Noncancer Pain,” by Michael A. Ashburn, M.D., M.P.H., and Lee A. Fleisher, M.D., of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jama.2018.18472)
Editor’s Note: The article includes conflict of interest and funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
Video embed code:
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), MONDAY, DECEMBER 17, 2018
Media Advisory: To contact corresponding author Guy Fagherazzi, Ph.D., email guy.fagherazzi@gustaveroussy.fr. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
To place an electronic embedded link in your story: Links will be live at the embargo time: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaneurology/fullarticle/10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.3960
Bottom Line: A study of French women suggests a lower risk of type 2 diabetes was observed among women who reported current migraines compared with women with no history of the painful headaches.
Why The Research Is Interesting: Migraine and type 2 diabetes are common conditions in women but an association between them remains unclear.
Who and What: A group of more 74,000 French women insured by a health plan that mostly covered teachers and who were followed up by questionnaire.
How (Study Design): This was an observational study. Researchers didn’t intervene for purposes of the study and they cannot control all the factors that could explain the study findings.
Authors: Guy Fagherazzi, Ph.D., of the Center for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Villejuif, France, and coauthors
Results:
Study Limitations: Potential reasons that could explain the observations by researchers are uncertain.
Study Conclusions: The results of this study could have implications on the understanding of the underlying causes of these two common conditions and more research is needed to understand potential reasons that could explain these findings.
Related Material: The editorial, “Potential Benefits of Migraine – What Is It Good For?” by Amy A. Gelfand, M.D., M.A.S., of the University of California, San Francisco, and a JAMA Neurology associate editor, and Elizabeth Loder, M.D., M.P.H., of Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, also is available on the For The Media website.
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.3960)
Editor’s Note: The article includes conflict of interest and funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), THURSDAY, DECEMBER 13, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding author Michael V. Boland, M.D., email Jianyi Nie at jnie4@jhmi.edu. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? Link will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaophthalmology/fullarticle/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.6066
Bottom Line: Mobile device reminders have been associated with better medication adherence and linking reminders to patient electronic health records (EHRs) could potentially allow some oversight by clinicians. In this study, 100 patients (average age 65) agreed to set up electronic health record-linked reminders delivered via text or voice message for glaucoma medications for three months and were surveyed about the experience. Of the participants, 94 ultimately set up reminders and 89 completed follow-up. Of these patients, 74 percent reported the reminders were useful, 15 percent were neutral about them and 11 percent found them not useful. Most participants (81 percent) had help setting up reminders. The generalizability of these results and the effect on glaucoma outcomes remains unknown.
Author: Michael V. Boland, M.D., Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, and coauthors
Related Material: The commentary, “Preliminary Steps to Address Glaucoma Medication Adherence,” by Paula Anne Newman-Casey, M.D., M.S., University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, and Jonathan S. Myers, M.D., Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, is also available on the For The Media website.
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.6066)
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), TUESDAY, DECEMBER 18, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding author Joan L. Blomquist, M.D., email John Lazarou at jlazarou@gbmc.org. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? Link will be live at the embargo time: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.2018.18315
Bottom Line: Pelvic floor disorders such as urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse (when one or more of the pelvic organs drop from their normal position) are associated with childbirth and affect millions of women in the United States. This study examined the risk of pelvic floor disorders based on the method of childbirth delivery among 1,500 women a decade or two after giving birth. Cesarean delivery compared with spontaneous vaginal delivery was associated with less risk of stress urinary incontinence, overactive bladder and pelvic organ prolapse. An operative vaginal delivery, such as using forceps or one that is vacuum-assisted, was associated with higher risk of anal incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. The data for the study were from a single hospital so the results may not be generalized to all populations.
Authors: Joan L. Blomquist, M.D., Greater Baltimore Medical Center, Maryland, and coauthors
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jama.2018.18315)
Editor’s Note: The article includes conflict of interest and funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 12, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding author Wayne A. Ray, Ph.D., email Craig Boerner at craig.boerner@vumc.org. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? Link will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapsychiatry/fullarticle/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.3421
Bottom Line: Antipsychotic medications can have adverse effects, including those that are life-threatening. This observational study examined the association of antipsychotic medications prescribed for children and young adults without psychosis and risk of unexpected death, which includes deaths due to unintentional drug overdose or cardiovascular/metabolic causes. About 250,000 children and young people (ages 5 to 24) enrolled in Medicaid in Tennessee were included. They were new users of antipsychotic medications who received higher or lower doses and new users of control medications that weren’t antipsychotics for comparison. An increased risk of unexpected death was associated with the group of patients who received a higher dose of antipsychotic medication compared with those who didn’t. Other factors could explain the differences between users of antipsychotics and control medications. These findings appear to reinforce careful prescribing and monitoring of antipsychotic medications in children and young people.
Authors: Wayne A. Ray, Ph.D., Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, and coauthors
Related Material: The editorial, “Antipsychotics, Excess Deaths, and Paradoxes of Child Psychiatry,” by Barbara Geller, M.D., Washington University in St. Louis, also is available on the For The Media website.
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/ jamapsychiatry.2018.3421)
Editor’s Note: The article includes funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), FRIDAY, DECEMBER 14, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding study author Eric Sun, M.D., Ph.D., email Amy Jeter Hansen at ajeterhansen@stanford.edu. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story?: Links will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5909
About JAMA Network Open: JAMA Network Open is the new online-only open access general medical journal from the JAMA Network. Every Friday, the journal publishes peer-reviewed clinical research and commentary in more than 40 medical and health subject areas. Every article is free online from the day of publication.
Bottom Line: The use of early physical therapy in a study of nearly 89,000 U.S. adults with musculoskeletal pain of the shoulder, neck, knee and low back was associated with a lower likelihood of subsequent opioid use in an analysis of health insurance claims from 2007 to 2015. For patients who did use opioids, early physical therapy was associated with reduced opioid use for shoulder, knee and low back pain but not neck pain. The findings suggest early physical therapy may play a role in reducing the risk of subsequent long-term opioid use by patients with musculoskeletal pain. This was an observational study so other potential mitigating factors could help to explain the results.
Authors: Eric Sun, M.D., Ph.D., Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, and coauthors
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5909)
Editor’s Note: The article contains conflict of interest and funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), FRIDAY, DECEMBER 14, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding study author Alice Chen, Ph.D., M.B.A., M.Sc., email Jenesse Miller at jenessem@usc.edu. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story?: Links will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5805
About JAMA Network Open: JAMA Network Open is the new online-only open access general medical journal from the JAMA Network. Every Friday, the journal publishes peer-reviewed clinical research and commentary in more than 40 medical and health subject areas. Every article is free online from the day of publication.
Bottom Line: This study examined the characteristics of physicians excluded from Medicare and state public insurance programs for fraud, health care crimes or unlawful prescribing of controlled substances. There were 2,222 physicians (0.3 percent) excluded temporarily or permanently between 2007 and 2017 based on federal data. Exclusion rates were highest in the West and Southeast, with West Virginia having the highest exclusion rate at almost 6 per 1,000 physicians (32 exclusions among 5,720 physicians). Overall, physicians were more likely to be excluded if they were male, had osteopathic training, were older or practiced in specific specialties (family medicine, psychiatry, internal medicine, anesthesiology, surgery and obstetrics/gynecology). The study design prevents causal inferences but may help to identify characteristics associated with physicians more or less likely to engage in fraud.
Authors: Alice Chen, Ph.D., M.B.A., M.Sc., University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, and coauthors
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5850)
Editor’s Note: The article contains conflict of interest and funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), MONDAY, DECEMBER 10, 2018
Media Advisory: To contact corresponding author Virginia J. Howard, Ph.D., email Holly Gainer at hgainer@uab.edu. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
To place an electronic embedded link in your story: Links will be live at the embargo time: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaneurology/fullarticle/10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.3862
Bottom Line: This study examined the risk of stroke by sex among more than 25,000 black and white women and men. White women had lower risk of stroke than white men and black women had lower risk than black men between the ages of 45 and 64; from 65 to 74 white women still had lower risk than white men but that difference didn’t persist among black women and men; and there was no difference by sex for either race at age 75 and older. The association of some risk factors with stroke risk also differed by sex for white women and men but not for black women and men. Study participants may not be representative of the general population. The findings suggest earlier and more aggressive management of risk factors may be warranted in some demographic groups to try to prevent stroke.
Authors: Virginia J. Howard, Ph.D., of the University of Alabama at Birmingham, and coauthors
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.3862)
Editor’s Note: The article includes conflict of interest and funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 12, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding author April W. Armstrong, M.D., M.P.H., email Cynthia Smith at Cynthia.Smith@med.usc.edu. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? Link will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamadermatology/fullarticle/10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.4566
Bottom Line: Eczema (atopic dermatitis) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that affects millions of adults and children and has been associated with depression and anxiety. Evidence on the association between eczema and suicidal thoughts or attempts has been inconclusive. This study evaluated the association between eczema and suicidal thoughts and attempts by analyzing the combined results of 15 studies including 310,000 patients with eczema and 4.4 million people without eczema. The findings suggest patients with eczema were more likely to have suicidal thoughts and attempts compared to people without eczema. Data on completed suicides were limited and had inconsistent results.
Authors: April W. Armstrong, M.D., M.P.H., University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, and coauthors
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.4566)
Editor’s Note: The article includes conflict of interest and funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), MONDAY, DECEMBER 10, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding author Meghan Miller, Ph.D., email Dorsey Griffith at dgriffith@ucdavis.edu. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? Link will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.4076
Bottom Line: Siblings born in a family after other children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) were more likely to be diagnosed with the same disorder or the other disorder.
Why The Research Is Interesting: ADHD and ASD are common neurodevelopmental disorders that likely share some genetic factors and biological influences. Estimating recurrence risk in families is a way to measure shared genetic factors. Such risk estimates are often based on the total number of siblings in a family rather than being limited to later-born siblings (those born after children with ASD or ADHD) so that risk can be underestimated if families decide to stop having children after a child develops ASD or ADHD. This study focused on risk for later-born siblings.
Who and What: A total of 15,175 later-born siblings classified by familial risk based on an older child’s diagnosis: ADHD risk (730), ASD risk (158) and no known risk (14,287); data were extracted from two large health care system in the United States.
How (Study Design): This was a population-based study.
Authors: Meghan Miller, Ph.D., of the University of California Davis Health System, Sacramento, California, and coauthors
Results:
Study Limitations: These include a selective sample, lack of information on half- or full-sibling status, and data drawn from general medical records.
Study Conclusions:
Related Material: The editorial, “Later Sibling Recurrence of Autism Spectrum Disorder and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Clinical and Mechanistic Insights,” by Tony Charman, Ph.D., of King’s College London, and Emily J.H. Jones, Ph.D., of the University of London, both in the United Kingdom, also is available on the For The Media website.
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.4076)
Editor’s Note: The article contains funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 12, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding author Heather Yeo, M.D., M.H.S., email Krystle Lopez at krl2003@med.cornell.edu. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? Link will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/fullarticle/10.1001/jamasurg.2018.4650
Bottom Line: Most patients who qualify for weight loss surgery don’t have the procedure despite its safety and effectiveness. One reason may be negative public attitudes toward weight loss surgery. This study assessed attitudes toward weight loss surgery with a national survey that included about 950 respondents. Nearly half reported they thought most people who had weight loss surgery did it for cosmetic reasons and about 40 percent thought people who had weight loss surgery chose the “easy way out.” Women were more likely to think most weight loss surgical procedures were performed for health reasons and less likely to think of surgery as an easy way out. The association between more negative attitudes about weight loss surgery and people not opting for it supports the suggestion that public attitudes may be at least partly responsible for the low use of weight loss surgical procedures.
Authors: Heather Yeo, M.D., M.H.S., New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, and coauthors
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2018.4650)
Editor’s Note: Editor’s Note: The article includes funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), FRIDAY, DECEMBER 7, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding study author Emese Zsiros, M.D., Ph.D., email Annie Deck-Miller at annie.deck-miller@roswellpark.org. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story?: Links will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5452
About JAMA Network Open: JAMA Network Open is the new online-only open access general medical journal from the JAMA Network. Every Friday, the journal publishes peer-reviewed clinical research and commentary in more than 40 medical and health subject areas. Every article is free online from the day of publication.
Bottom Line: An ultrarestrictive opioid prescribing strategy was associated with a reduction in the number of pills dispensed in a study of patients having surgery for gynecologic cancer, without changes in postoperative pain scores, complications or increases in prescription refill requests. Under the protocol, patients having ambulatory or minimally invasive surgery weren’t prescribed opioids at discharge unless they required more than five doses of oral or intravenous opioids while in the hospital. Surgical patients who had an abdominal incision (laparotomy) were given a three-day supply of opioids when they were discharged. The average number of opioid pills dispensed at discharge decreased after the ultrarestrictive prescribing protocol was implemented from 43.6 to 12.1 for patients who had a laparotomy; from 38.4 to 1.3 for patients who had minimally invasive surgery; and from 13.9 to 0.2 for patients who had ambulatory surgery. The findings reveal a promising strategy for decreasing postoperative opioid prescribing without increasing pain.
Authors: Emese Zsiros, M.D., Ph.D., Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, and coauthors
Related Material: The invited commentary, “Striving for Evidence-Based Postoperative Opioid Prescribing While Optimizing Perioperative Pain Management—Shifting to Conservative Prescribing,” by Jennifer M. Hah, M.D., M.S., Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, also is available on the For The Media website.
Visual Abstract:
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5452)
Editor’s Note: The article contains conflict of interest and funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), FRIDAY, JANUARY 4, 2019
Media advisory: To contact corresponding study author Ruchi S. Gupta, M.D., M.P.H., email Vita Lerman at VLerman@luriechildrens.org. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story?: Links will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5630
About JAMA Network Open: JAMA Network Open is the new online-only open access general medical journal from the JAMA Network. Every Friday, the journal publishes peer-reviewed clinical research and commentary in more than 40 medical and health subject areas. Every article is free online from the day of publication.
Bottom Line: Survey data suggest at least 1 in 10 U.S. adults are food allergic and nearly 1 in 5 believe they have a food allergy. Food allergies are expensive and potentially life-threatening conditions. In this nationally representative survey study of more than 40,000 U.S. adults, nearly half of food-allergic adults developed allergies during adulthood, many reported being allergic to multiple foods, and 38 percent reported at least one food allergy–related emergency department visit in their lifetime. Shellfish allergy was the most common, followed by milk, peanut, tree nut and fin fish. Self-reported food allergies by study participants weren’t confirmed by diagnosis.
Authors: Ruchi S. Gupta, M.D., M.P.H., Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine and the Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital, Chicago, and coauthors
Visual Abstract
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5630)
Editor’s Note: The article contains conflict of interest and funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
Below is a visual abstract for the December 5 JAMA Surgery study, “Association of Prevalence of Benign Pathologic Findings After Partial Nephrectomy With Preoperative Imaging Patterns in the United States From 2007 to 2014,” by Jae Heon Kim, M.D., Ph.D., Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, South Korea and coauthors.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 5, 2018
Media Advisory: To contact corresponding author Ole Köhler-Forsberg, M.D., email karkoe@rm.dk. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? Link will be live at the embargo time: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapsychiatry/fullarticle/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.3428
Bottom Line: This study used Danish nationwide registries to investigate an association between infections treated since birth and subsequent risk of treated childhood and adolescent mental disorders. Among nearly 1.1 million people born in Denmark between 1995 and 2012, about 42,000 (3.9 percent) were hospitalized for any mental disorder and nearly 57,000 (5.2 percent) redeemed a prescription for psychotropic medication. Infections requiring hospitalization were associated with subsequent increased risk of hospitalization for any mental disorder and increased risk of psychotropic medication use. Infections treated with medication, especially antibiotics, were associated with increased risk. Risks differed among mental disorders. Schizophrenia spectrum disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, personality and behavior disorders, mental retardation, autism spectrum disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder, and tic disorders were associated with the highest risks after infections. This is an observational study and other factors might explain the results including the consequences of infections on the developing brain and other influences such as genetics and disturbances of the gut biome.
Authors: Ole Köhler-Forsberg, M.D., of Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark, and coauthors
Related Material: The editorial, “Harbingers of Mental Disease – Infections Associated With an Increased Risk for Neuropsychiatric Illness in Children,” by Viviane Labrie, Ph.D., and Lena Brundin, M.D., Ph.D., of the Van Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, Michigan, also is available on the For The Media website.
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/ jamapsychiatry.2018.3428)
Editor’s Note: The article includes funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 5, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding author Edward G. Soltesz, M.D., M.P.H., email Andrea Pacetti at PACETTA@ccf.org. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? Link will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/fullarticle/10.1001/jamasurg.2018.4608
Bottom Line: Persistent use of opioids by patients is a public health concern in the United States but not much is known about the effect of that use on patients undergoing cardiac surgery. This observational study included 5.7 million patients who underwent cardiac surgery and it compared outcomes among those with persistent opioid use or dependence and those patients without. Researchers report no significant difference in the rate of death between the two groups of patients, although patients with persistent opioid use or dependence had a higher number of complications overall, longer length of hospital stay and higher costs. Limitations of the study include the possibility that opioid overuse disorders were underreported and that the definitions of opioid dependence or persistent opioid use weren’t consistent between hospitals.
Visual Abstract
Authors: Edward G. Soltesz, M.D., M.P.H., Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, and coauthors
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2018.4608)
Editor’s Note: Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), MONDAY, DECEMBER 3, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding author Wei Bao, M.D., Ph.D., email Tom Snee at Tom-snee@uiowa.edu. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? Link will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.4208
Bottom Line: National survey data for 43,000 U.S. children suggests an estimated 2.8 percent have ever been diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and 2.5 percent currently have ASD. Among 1,115 children with current ASD, almost 30 percent aren’t treated with behavioral therapies or medication. ASD is a neurodevelopmental disorder marked by social impairments, communication difficulties, repetitive behaviors and restricted interests. Symptoms of ASD are often treated with behavioral therapies and medications. Among children with ASD who were treated, almost 64 percent received behavioral treatment and 27 percent received medication. In the study, which used data from the 2016 National Survey of Children’s Health, the frequency of ASD among children varied by state. The study has limitations, including that physician diagnoses of ASD were self-reported by parents. Understanding why some children with ASD don’t receive treatment is important.
Authors: Wei Bao, M.D., Ph.D., of the University of Iowa, Iowa City, and coauthors
To Learn More: All the articles are available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.4208)
Editor’s Note: Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), MONDAY, DECEMBER 3, 2018
Media advisory: To contact study author Alan R. Schroeder, M.D., email Erin Digitale at digitale@stanford.edu. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? Links will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5419
Bottom Line: An analysis of claims data for privately insured adolescents and young adults suggests initial exposure to opioids prescribed by dental providers may be associated with increased risk of subsequent opioid use and abuse. Dentists are a leading source of opioid prescriptions for children and adolescents. This observational study examined outpatient opioid prescriptions for patients 16 to 25 in 2015 because that’s the common age when third molars show up and are extracted. Included in the study were 14,888 people in an opioid-exposed group because they had filled an opioid prescription from a dental provider and 29,776 in a control group not exposed to opioids. The study relied on diagnosis codes so some misclassification may have happened and the results may not be generalized to other insured patients. The study concludes that more scrutiny of third-molar extractions and opioid prescriptions associated with postoperative care is needed.
Authors: Alan R. Schroeder, M.D., of Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, and coauthors
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5419)
Editor’s Note: The article contains funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or emailmediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), MONDAY, DECEMBER 3, 2018
Media advisory: To contact study author Kasia J. Lipska, M.D., M.H.S., email Ziba Kashef at ziba.kashef@yale.edu. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? Links will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5008
Bottom Line: In a small survey of patients at an urban diabetes center, 1 in 4 reported skimping on their prescribed insulin because of cost and this was associated with poor glycemic control. Insulin is lifesaving for people with diabetes and is listed as an essential medicine by the World Health Organization, which means that it should be available at a price individuals and the community can afford. Insulin prices have increased substantially in the past decade in the United States and so have out-of-pocket prescription costs. Of the 199 patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes who were prescribed insulin and who completed the survey, 51 (25.5 percent) reported cost-related underuse of insulin. Underuse included using less than prescribed, trying to stretch out insulin, smaller doses, stopping insulin, not filling a prescription or not starting prescribed insulin. More than a third of the patients with cost-related underuse didn’t discuss the matter with their doctor. The single-center study may be limited in its broader ability to be generalized but researchers conclude the results highlight an urgent need to address the affordability of insulin.
Authors: Kasia J. Lipska, M.D., M.H.S., of the Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, and coauthors
Related Material: The invited commentary, “When High Prices Mean Needless Death,” by Elisabeth Rosenthal, M.D. , of Kaiser Health News, Washington, D.C., also is available on the For The Media website.
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5008)
Editor’s Note: The article contains conflict of interest and funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or emailmediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), TUESDAY, DECEMBER 4, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding author Dowin H. Boatright, M.D., M.B.A., M.H.S., email Ziba Kashef at ziba.kashef@yale.edu. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? Link will be live at the embargo time: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.2018.13705
Bottom Line: This observational study looked at changes in student makeup by sex, race and ethnicity at U.S. medical schools after an accrediting organization introduced diversity standards in 2009. An analysis of data from 120 medical schools suggests implementation of the diversity standards were associated with increasing percentages of female and black students. The study cannot demonstrate causality and other unaccounted factors could help explain the findings. Researchers noted the results are promising but that disparities persist in the diversity of the physician workforce.
Authors: Dowin H. Boatright, M.D., M.B.A., M.H.S., Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, and coauthors
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jama.2018.13705)
Editor’s Note: The article includes conflict of interest and funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), TUESDAY, DECEMBER 4, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding author Anupam B. Jena, M.D., Ph.D., email Ekaterina Pesheva at Ekaterina_Pesheva@hms.harvard.edu. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? Link will be live at the embargo time: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.2018.14270
Bottom Line: Health care professionals not born in the United States, including those who are noncitizens, made up a significant proportion of the health care workforce in 2016. An analysis of U.S. Census Bureau data for 164,000 health care professionals found 16.6 percent weren’t born in the United States and 4.6 percent were noncitizens. Non-U.S.-born health care professionals were a substantial proportions of several health care professions, including physicians (29 percent), dentists (24 percent), pharmacists (20 percent), registered nurses (16 percent) and nursing, psychiatric, and home health aides (23 percent). The majority of health care professionals not born in the United States were born in Asia (6.4 percent) or Mexico and Central America or the Caribbean (4.7 percent). The studied relied on survey-reported occupation and there was the possibility of underreporting of noncitizenship.
Authors: Anupam B. Jena, M.D., Ph.D., Harvard Medical School, Boston, and coauthors
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jama.2018.14270)
Editor’s Note: The article includes conflict of interest and funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding author Matthew J. Elrick. M.D., Ph.D., email Vanessa McMains at vmcmain1@jhmi.edu. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? Link will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.4890
Bottom Line: Acute flaccid myelitis (AFM) is a poorly understood polio-like illness mostly of children characterized by weakness of muscles and limbs and the presence of a spinal cord lesion. An increase in cases was first suspected in 2012 and some epidemiologic evidence suggests viruses may be associated with AFM outbreaks in the United States in the late summer and fall of 2014, 2016 and 2018. Much still needs to be learned about the cause, progression, biomarkers, prognosis and treatment of this rare condition.
JAMA Pediatrics published three new articles on AFM because of their clinical and public health importance:
To Learn More: All the articles are available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.4890)
Editor’s Note: Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 29, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding author Akira Ohtsuru, M.D., Ph.D., email ohtsuru@fmu.ac.jp. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? Link will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaotolaryngology/fullarticle/10.1001/jamaoto.2018.3121
Bottom Line: The accident at Japan’s Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station in 2011 raised grave concerns about radioactive material released into the environment, including concerns over radiation-induced thyroid cancer. Ultrasound screenings for thyroid cancer were subsequently conducted in the Fukushima Health Management Survey. This observational study group includes about 324,000 people 18 or younger at the time of the accident and it reports on two rounds of ultrasound screening during the first five years after the accident. Thyroid cancer or suspected cancer was identified in 187 individuals within five years (116 people in the first round among nearly 300,000 people screened and 71 in the second round among 271,000 screened). The overwhelmingly common diagnosis in surgical cases was papillary thyroid cancer (149 of 152 or 98 percent).
Authors: Akira Ohtsuru, M.D., Ph.D., Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan, and coauthors
Related material: The commentary, “Why the Data From the Fukushima Health Management Survey After the Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Accident Are Important,” by Andrew J. Bauer, M.D., University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, and Louise Davies, M.D., M.S., Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont, is available on the For The Media website.
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2018.3121)
Editor’s Note: The article includes conflict of interest disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding study author Renee Y. Hsia, M.D., M.Sc., email Elizabeth Fernandez at elizabeth.fernandez@ucsf.edu. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story?: Links will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5202
About JAMA Network Open: JAMA Network Open is the new online-only open access general medical journal from the JAMA Network. Every Friday, the journal publishes peer-reviewed clinical research and commentary in more than 40 medical and health subject areas. Every article is free online from the day of publication.
Bottom Line: Patients from the poorest neighborhoods who had cardiac arrest had longer total ambulance times than those from the wealthiest neighborhoods.
Why The Research Is Interesting: Emergency medical services (EMS) provide critical care before patients reach the hospital and differences in ambulance times may contribute to disparities in patient outcomes.
What and When: National data from 46 states on 63,600 patients who had cardiac arrest and didn’t die on scene and were transported to a hospital
What (Study Measures and Outcomes): Four time measures were examined (response time, on-scene time, transport time and total EMS time) and compared with EMS response time benchmarks for responding to cardiac arrest calls.
How (Study Design): This was an observational study. Researchers weren’t intervening for purposes of the study and cannot control all the natural differences that could explain the study findings.
Authors: Renee Y. Hsia, M.D., M.Sc., University of California, San Francisco, and coauthors
Results:
Study Limitations: The registry analyzed for this study wasn’t of individual patients so multiple reports associated with the same patient exist; other explanations beyond the variables assessed in this study may have contributed to time disparities; and the findings may not be generalized to other types of time-sensitive EMS calls.
Study Conclusions:
Related Material: The invited commentary, “Income and Ambulance Response Time Inequality—No Simple Explanation, No Simple Fix,” by Andrew I. Friedson, Ph.D., University of Colorado Denver, also is available on the For The Media website.
Visual Abstract: This visual abstract also is available on the For The Media website.
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.4945)
Editor’s Note: The article contains funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 28, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding author Deepak L. Bhatt, M.D., M.P.H., email Johanna Younghans at jyounghans@bwh.harvard.edu. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? Link will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/10.1001/jamacardio.2018.3951
Bottom Line: Whether hospital rankings by U.S. News & World Report magazine reflect quality of care has been debated. This study examined if the magazine’s 50 top-ranked hospitals for cardiovascular care performed better than 3,500 non-ranked hospitals on death rates and hospital readmissions for three cardiovascular conditions, as well as patient satisfaction. Researchers report top-ranked hospitals did have lower 30-day mortality rates for heart attack, heart failure and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and higher patient satisfaction ratings compared with non-ranked hospitals. However, 30-day readmission rates were either similar (for heart attack and CABG) or higher (for heart failure) at the top-ranked hospitals compared with non-ranked hospitals. The discrepancy between readmissions and other measures raises concern that readmissions may not be an adequate metric of hospital care quality. A limitation of the study was that the rankings only include data from Medicare patients.
Authors: Deepak L. Bhatt, M.D., M.P.H., Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, and coauthors
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2018.3951)
Editor’s Note: The article includes conflict of interest disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding study author Ryan Vandrey, Ph.D., email Vanessa McMains at vmcmain1@jhmi.edu. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story?: Links will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.4841
About JAMA Network Open: JAMA Network Open is the new online-only open access general medical journal from the JAMA Network. Every Friday, the journal publishes peer-reviewed clinical research and commentary in more than 40 medical and health subject areas. Every article is free online from the day of publication.
Bottom Line: Researchers compared the effects of smoked versus vaporized cannabis at two different doses and a placebo dose in a small study of 17 healthy adults who weren’t regular cannabis users. Participants felt the effects of smoked and vaporized cannabis at a 10-mg dose of the psychoactive component THC, including modest cognitive impairment, while a 25-mg dose of THC produced more pronounced drug effects and substantial impairment of cognitive and psychomotor functioning. Vaporized cannabis produced stronger drug effects on users and higher blood concentrations of THC compared with equal doses of smoked cannabis. The study was limited by a small range of doses.
Authors: Ryan Vandrey, Ph.D., Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, and coauthors
Related Material: The invited commentary, “Peering Through the Haze of Smoked vs Vaporized Cannabis—To Vape or Not to Vape?” by Nadia Solowij, Ph.D., University of Wollongong, Australia, also is available on the For The Media website.
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.4841)
Editor’s Note: The article contains conflict of interest and funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 27, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding author Michael L. Barnett, M.D., M.S., email Chris Sweeney at csweeney@hsph.harvard.edu. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? Link will be live at the embargo time: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.2018.12354
Bottom Line: Laws passed in 32 states promote the use of telemedicine by mandating coverage and reimbursement. Telemedicine is the remote evaluation, diagnosis and treatment of patients using electronic communication. In this study, claims data from a large, private U.S. health plan were analyzed to estimate the growth in telemedicine from 2005 to 2017. Researchers report telemedicine use increased substantially during those years but was still uncommon by 2017. Annual telemedicine visits among all members in this health plan increased from 0.020 to 6.57 per 1,000 members between 2005-2017, with the largest increases in use beginning in 2015. Most telemedicine users lived in urban areas, although the attention given to telemedicine is often to encourage its use in rural settings. These data are from a single insurer whose population and policies may not be generalized to other populations.
Authors: Michael L. Barnett, M.D., M.S., Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, and coauthors
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jama.2018.12354)
Editor’s Note: The article includes funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 21, 2018
Media advisory: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story?: Links will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5147
About JAMA Network Open: JAMA Network Open is the new online-only open access general medical journal from the JAMA Network. Every Friday, the journal publishes peer-reviewed clinical research and commentary in more than 40 medical and health subject areas. Every article is free online from the day of publication.
Visual abstract: The study, “Assessment of Incorrect Surgical Procedures Within and Outside the Operating Room,” is accompanied by the visual abstract below
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 21, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding study author Jordan E. DeVylder, Ph.D., email Kylie Lacey at kylie@tvpcommunications.com. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story?: Links will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.4945
About JAMA Network Open: JAMA Network Open is the new online-only open access general medical journal from the JAMA Network. Every Friday, the journal publishes peer-reviewed clinical research and commentary in more than 40 medical and health subject areas. Every article is free online from the day of publication.
Bottom Line: Exposure to police violence is increasingly recognized as a public health issue in the United States. In this survey study of 1,000 adults in Baltimore, Maryland, and New York, New York, exposure to police violence was reported by many residents, especially those who were racial/ethnic and sexual minorities. The frequency of exposure to police violence over 12 months ranged from 3 percent for sexual violence (i.e. inappropriate sexual contact including during a body search) to 7.5 percent for physical violence without a weapon (i.e. hit, punched, dragged) and 4.6 percent for physical violence with a weapon (i.e. use of gun, baton, taser) to 13 percent for psychological violence (i.e. threats, intimidation, being stopped without cause) and nearly 15 percent for neglectful policing (i.e. police were called for help but never responded or responded too late or inappropriately). These exposures were associated with a greater likelihood of mental health issues, including psychological distress, suicidal thoughts, suicide attempts and psychotic experiences. The authors note causal inferences cannot be drawn from the findings and more research is needed to understand the effect over time of exposure to violence by police.
Authors: Jordan E. DeVylder, Ph.D., Fordham University, New York, and coauthors
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.4945)
Editor’s Note: The article contains funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), MONDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding author Aaron J. Blashill, Ph.D., email Cory Marshall at cory.marshall@sdsu.edu. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? Link will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.3678
Bottom Line: The frequency of eating disorder diagnoses was low among U.S. children ages 9 to 10 in an analysis of data from another study. Across all eating disorder diagnoses, the overall frequency was 1.4 percent with no significant differences between girls and boys in a nationally representative group of 4,500 children 9 to 10 years old. The authors suggest sex differences in eating disorders may not emerge until later on in adolescence. In this group of children, the prevalence of anorexia nervosa was 0.1 percent, there were no cases of bulimia nervosa, the frequency of binge-eating disorder was 0.6 percent, and the prevalence of any other specified feeding and eating disorder diagnosis was 0.7 percent.
Authors: Aaron J. Blashill, Ph.D., of San Diego State University, San Diego, California, and coauthors
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.3678)
Editor’s Note: Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 21, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding study author Kathryn Walton, Ph.D., R.D., email Deirdre Healey at healeyd@uoguelph.ca. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story?: Links will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5217
About JAMA Network Open: JAMA Network Open is the new online-only open access general medical journal from the JAMA Network. Every Friday, the journal publishes peer-reviewed clinical research and commentary in more than 40 medical and health subject areas. Every article is free online from the day of publication.
Bottom Line: More frequent family dinners were associated with more healthful eating by adolescents and young adults, regardless of the level of family functioning in managing daily routines, communicating and connecting emotionally. This study used data from 2,728 teenagers and young adults (14 to 24) living at home with their parents and included details on the frequency of family meals, foods eaten and levels of family functioning. Frequent family meals were associated with eating more fruits and vegetables and less fast food and takeout food for young people in both high-functioning and low-functioning families. The findings suggest family dinners are a good way to encourage more healthful eating in adolescents and young adults.
Authors: Kathryn Walton, Ph.D., R.D., University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada, and coauthors
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5217 )
Editor’s Note: The article contains conflict of interest and funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 27, 2018
Media advisory: To contact the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, email the Media Coordinator at Newsroom@USPSTF.net or call 202-572-2044. The full report is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this report in your story? Link will be live at the embargo time and all links to all USPSTF articles remain free indefinitely: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.2018.17772
Bottom Line: The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) finds limited or inconsistent evidence on the benefits of primary care interventions to prevent child maltreatment (defined as abuse, neglect or both). Children with signs or symptoms suggesting maltreatment should be assessed or reported according to applicable state laws.
Background: The USPSTF routinely makes recommendations about the effectiveness of preventive care services. This latest statement reaffirms its 2013 position that there is insufficient evidence on the benefits of primary care interventions to prevent child maltreatment. In 2016, approximately 676,000 children in the United States experienced maltreatment and more than 1,700 children died as a result.
The USPSTF Recommendation:
Related Material
The following related elements from The JAMA Network are also available on the For The Media website:
— An interview with Alex R. Kemper, M.D., M.P.H., M.S., USPSTF member and coauthor of the recommendation statement. The transcript is available here.
— Interventions to Prevent Child Maltreatment – U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
— Primary Care Interventions to Prevent Child Maltreatment – Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
— JAMA editorial: Preventing Maltreatment of Children
— JAMA Patient Page: Interventions to Prevent Child Maltreatment
(doi:10.1001/jama.2018.17772)
Editor’s Note: Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
Note: More information about the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, its process, and its recommendations can be found on the newsroom page of its website.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding author Emily N. Ussery, Ph.D., email CDC Media Relations at media@cdc.gov. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? Link will be live at the embargo time: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.2018.17797
Bottom Line: Sitting too long and being physically inactive can be bad for your health, and it’s important to understand how common these behaviors are among U.S. adults. This study used data from a nationally representative survey of about 5,900 adults to examine sitting time and leisure-time physical activity. Researchers report 1 in 4 adults sit for more than 8 hours a day, 4 in 10 are physically inactive with no moderate or vigorous activity during the week, and 1 in 10 reported both sitting more than 8 hours a day and being physically inactive. Limitations of the study include self-reported data. Practitioners can help support programs and policies that help adults sit less and move more.
Authors: Emily N. Ussery, Ph.D., Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, and coauthors
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jama.2018.17797)
Editor’s Note: The article includes funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), MONDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding author Lief Pagalan, M.Sc., email Ian Bryce at ian_bryce@sfu.ca. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? Link will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.3101
Bottom Line: In a study of estimated exposure to air pollution at mothers’ homes during pregnancy, 1 of 3 airborne pollutants was associated with increased risk of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in children in a Canadian metropolitan area with relatively low ambient air pollution levels. What causes ASD isn’t known but some previous research has suggested environmental contaminants and air pollution may be potential risk factors. This study included nearly all births in Vancouver, British Columbia, from 2004 through 2009. Among 132,256 births, 1 percent of children (1,307) were diagnosed with ASD by age 5. Of three pollutants, nitric oxide (NO) was positively associated with increased risk of ASD after accounting for other potential mitigating factors. NO was used as an indicator of traffic-related pollution. Other potential unaccounted factors could tamp down the study findings; direct assessment of air pollution exposure wasn’t possible; and the study cannot draw causal inferences.
Authors: Lief Pagalan, M.Sc., Simon Fraser University, British Columbia, Canada, and coauthors
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.3101)
Editor’s Note: The article includes funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), MONDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding author Erin R. Morgan, M.S., email Barbara Clements at bac60@uw.edu. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? Link will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.3624
Bottom Line: Firearm injuries and deaths among children are a public health issue. This study used telephone survey data from 5,200 people in Washington to describe how common firearms were in households with children in the state and to assess the association between children living in a home with a firearm stored unsafely and an adult who reported misusing alcohol. About 30 percent of children in the state lived in firearm-owning households and an estimated 55 percent of those children lived with a firearm not stored safely. Firearms were more likely to be stored unsafely in homes where an adult reported misusing alcohol. A limitation of the study is the likely underreporting of unsafe gun storage practices.
Authors: Erin R. Morgan, M.S., University of Washington, Seattle, and coauthors
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.3624)
Editor’s Note: The article includes funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), MONDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 2018
Media Advisory: To contact corresponding author Rosalyn Hithersay, M.Sc., email rosalyn.hithersay@kcl.ac.uk. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
To place an electronic embedded link in your story: Links will be live at the embargo time: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaneurology/fullarticle/10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.3616
Bottom Line: Older adults with Down syndrome are at increased risk for developing dementia. This study examined the effect of dementia on death rates in adults with Down syndrome in the United Kingdom. The study included 211 adults, of whom 66 had dementia with an average age at diagnosis of 52. Over the 5 ½-year study period, 27 adults died, 70 percent of whom had dementia, and their average age at death was 57. The study was limited by its small sample size. The high proportion of adults with Down syndrome who go on to develop dementia make this an important population for studying disease progression and potential treatments.
Authors: Rosalyn Hithersay, M.Sc., King’s College London, London, and coauthors
Related Material: The editorial, “Prevalence and Severity of Alzheimer Disease in Individuals With Down Syndrome,” by Michael S. Rafii, M.D., Ph.D., Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, San Diego, and Stephanie L. Santoro, M.D., Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, also is available on the For The Media website.
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.3616)
Editor’s Note: The article includes funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding author Noel T. Mueller, Ph.D., M.P.H., email Barbara Benham at bbenham1@jhu.edu. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? Link will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/10.1001/jamacardio.2018.3676
Bottom Line: A common belief in cardiology is that blood pressure (BP) increases with age, although studies find little evidence of that among non-Western adults in isolated communities. But does the association between age and BP differ in two isolated communities with different levels of Westernization? In this study, researchers examined the association between age and BP in two communities in a remote area of the Venezuelan rainforest inaccessible by land. The Yanomami community is made up of hunter-gatherer-gardeners who are among the least assimilated people in the world. The Yekwana people live near the Yanomami but they have been exposed to missions and an airstrip has allowed for delivery of medicine and other features of Western lifestyle, including occasional exposure to processed foods and salt. Blood pressure measurements were taken for 72 Yanomami and 83 Yekwana participants between the ages of 1 and 60 over about five months. Researchers found no age-associated rise in BP in Yanomami children and adults, whereas there was an age-associated rise in BP in the more Western-exposed Yekwana community that began in childhood. These results add to findings that suggest the rise in BP with age may not be natural but rather a consequence of unnatural Western exposures. A limitation of the study was its small sample size.
Authors: Noel T. Mueller, Ph.D., M.P.H., Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, and coauthors
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2018.3676)
Editor’s Note: The article includes conflict of interest and funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), MONDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 2018
Media advisory: To contact study author Carolyn J. Gibson, Ph.D., M.P.H., email Suzanne Leigh at Suzanne.Leigh@ucsf.eduv. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? Links will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5233
Bottom Line: A history of intimate partner violence or sexual assault and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms are common among midlife and older women and are associated with women’s experience of menopause.
Why The Research Is Interesting: Violence against women is a public health problem. The general health and functioning of midlife and older women can be affected by common symptoms related to menopause and aging, including trouble sleeping, vasomotor symptoms such as hot flashes, and vaginal symptoms including dryness, irritation and pain during sex. How exposure to trauma and PTSD symptoms might be linked to the development and exacerbation of these common symptoms throughout the menopause transition is unclear.
Who and When: Multiethnic group of about 2,000 women between 40 and 80 in the Kaiser Permanente Northern California health care system; data analysis conducted from late 2008 to early 2012
What (Measures and Outcomes): Lifetime physical or emotional intimate partner violence (IPV), sexual assault, and current PTSD symptoms assessed through questionnaires (exposures); difficulty sleeping, vasomotor symptoms and vaginal symptoms assessed through questionnaires (outcomes)
How (Study Design): This was an observational study. Researchers weren’t intervening for purposes of the study and they cannot control natural differences that could explain the study findings.
Authors: Carolyn J. Gibson, Ph.D., M.P.H., of the San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, California, and coauthors
Results: About 1 in 5 women experienced IPV or sexual assault and nearly 1 in 4 had PTSD symptoms. A history of emotional IPV and PTSD symptoms were associated with difficulty sleeping, vasomotor symptoms and vaginal symptoms; a history of physical IPV was associated with night sweats; and sexual assault was associated with vaginal symptoms.
Study Limitations: Findings should be interpreted in the context of limitations of the data, including that they don’t allow for determinations to made about trends over time, the duration of menopause symptoms and traumatic exposures, or other associations between variables.
Study Conclusions:
Related Material: The invited commentary, “Association of Interpersonal Violence with Women’s Health,” by Rebecca C. Thurston, Ph.D., and Elizabeth Miller, M.D., Ph.D., of the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, is available on the For The Media website.
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5233)
Editor’s Note: The article contains conflict of interest and funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or emailmediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding study author Ching-Ti Liu, Ph.D., and Andrew Stokes, Ph.D., email Meaghan Agnew at meaghans@bu.edu. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story?: Links will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.4587
About JAMA Network Open: JAMA Network Open is the new online-only open access general medical journal from the JAMA Network. Every Friday, the journal publishes peer-reviewed clinical research and commentary in more than 40 medical and health subject areas. Every article is free online from the day of publication.
Bottom Line: A patient’s weight history could help identify those at increased risk of dying. Using data for nearly 6,200 people from the Framingham Heart Study, this study incorporated weight history to examine the association between obesity and risk of death because many studies typically rely on weight status at a single point in time. Researchers found an association between maximum body mass index (BMI) over 24 years of weight history and risk of death, with increasing risk for obese individuals compared to those who were normal weight. Maximum BMI in the normal-weight range was associated with the lowest risk of death, pointing to the importance of obesity prevention.
Authors: Ching-Ti Liu, Ph.D., Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, and co-authors
Related Material: The invited commentary, “Long-Term Body Mass Index and Mortality in the Framingham Heart Study,” by Mark A. Pereira, Ph.D., University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, also is available on the For The Media website.
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.4587 )
Editor’s Note: The article contains funding/support and conflict of interest disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding study author Megan A. Moreno, M.D., M.S.Ed., M.P.H., email Toni Morrissey at TMorrissey@uwhealth.org. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story?: Links will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.2242
About JAMA Network Open: JAMA Network Open is the new online-only open access general medical journal from the JAMA Network. Every Friday, the journal publishes peer-reviewed clinical research and commentary in more than 40 medical and health subject areas. Every article is free online from the day of publication.
Bottom Line: Recreational marijuana use was legalized in the state of Washington in 2012 and there are regulations about posting product promotion messages on social media, while direct advertising of marijuana on social media remains illegal. Under state regulations, marijuana companies can’t advertise using language that promotes overconsumption, describes marijuana’s curative or therapeutic benefits, or is designed to appeal to youths. This study analyzed more than 1,000 posts on Facebook and Twitter from the business pages of six recreational marijuana companies in Washington state to see how often they adhered to state regulations. Most social media posts were consistent with state regulations but there were 17 posts (1.7 percent) that encouraged overconsumption; 137 posts (13.3 percent) that promoted therapeutic benefits; and nine posts (0.01 percent) that appealed to youth. Requirements for warnings addressing intoxication, driving, health risks and age restrictions were on 110 posts (10.7%).
Visual Abstract
Authors: Megan A. Moreno, M.D., M.S.Ed., M.P.H., University of Wisconsin-Madison, and coauthors
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.2242 )
Editor’s Note: The article contains funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding study author Marcus Shaker, M.D., M.S., email Mike Barwell at Michael.R.Barwell@hitchcock.org. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story?: Links will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.4728
About JAMA Network Open: JAMA Network Open is the new online-only open access general medical journal from the JAMA Network. Every Friday, the journal publishes peer-reviewed clinical research and commentary in more than 40 medical and health subject areas. Every article is free online from the day of publication.
Bottom Line: For children and adults with food allergies, personal self-injectable epinephrine devices are crucial to treating severe reactions such as anaphylaxis if there is unintended exposure to allergens. Autoinjectors have become very expensive, although the drug they inject is cheap. In this study of simulated children with peanut allergy, researchers estimated value-based pricing for the devices, which is a method of drug pricing where drug costs are based on the magnitude of the benefit they provide. This analysis suggests a value-based pricing model for autoinjectors at no more than $24 a year for children with peanut allergies to protect against risk of death.
Authors: Marcus Shaker, M.D., M.S., Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, New Hampshire, and Matthew Greenhawt, M.D., M.B.A., M.Sc., University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.4728)
Editor’s Note: The article contains conflict of interest disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding author Eileen E. Birch, Ph.D., email Vanessa Peterson at vpeterson@retinafoundation.org. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? Link will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaophthalmology/fullarticle/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.5527
Bottom Line: Academic performance, interactions with peers, and athletic ability are factors connected to self-esteem in school children. This study of children in the third to eighth grades looked at whether the condition “lazy eye” or amblyopia, where one eye has reduced vision due to misalignment or blur, was associated with lower self-perception by children of their competence, appearance, conduct and self-worth. The study included 50 children with amblyopia, along with 13 others without it but with misalignment or blur of one eye, and 18 children with no such eye conditions in a control group for comparison. Children with “lazy eye” had lower scholastic, social and athletic scores on a self-perception profile than the children in the control group. Reading speed was associated with self-perception of academic competence, while aiming and catching skills were associated with self-perception of scholastic, social and athletic ability for children with amblyopia. However, it is unknown if improvements in sensory function because of treatment for amblyopia will result in improved self-perception scores.
Authors: Eileen E. Birch, Ph.D., Retina Foundation of the Southwest, Dallas, and coauthors
Related Material: The commentary, “Childhood Self-Perceptions in Children With Amblyopia,” by Joseph L. Demer, M.D., Ph.D., University of California, Los Angeles, is available on the For The Media website.
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.5527)
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
A summary video is available for the study, “Effect of a Pharmacist-Led Educational Intervention on Inappropriate Medication Prescriptions in Older Adults,” by Cara Tannenbaum, M.D., M.Sc., Université de Montréal, Quebec, Canada, and coauthors. The video can be viewed on this page and embedded on your website by copying and pasting the HTML code below. To download the video, email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org for information.
Video embed code:
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), MONDAY, NOVEMBER 12, 2018
Media Advisory: To contact corresponding author Michael Fralick, M.D., S.M., email Heidi Singer at Heidi.Singer@utoronto.ca. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
To place an electronic embedded link in your story: Links will be live at the embargo time: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaneurology/fullarticle/10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.3487
Bottom Line: Experiencing concussions or mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) was associated with increased risk of suicide in a new analysis but the absolute risk was small because nearly all patients diagnosed with concussion or TBI didn’t die by suicide. Data from 17 studies for more than 700,000 patients diagnosed with concussion or mild TBI and more than 6.2 million people without such diagnoses were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. A meta-analysis combines the results of multiple studies identified in a systematic review and quantitatively summarizes the overall association between the same exposure and outcomes measured across all studies. Researchers want more studies done to identify strategies to prevent concussions and mild TBI and to find ways to identify patients at highest risk of suicide after such injuries.
Authors: Michael Fralick, M.D., S.M., of the University of Toronto, Canada, and coauthors
Related Material: The editorial, “On the Link Between Concussions and Suicide,” by Donald A. Redelmeier, M.D., M.S.H.R., and Junaid A. Bhatti, M.B.B.S., M.Sc., Ph.D., of the University of Toronto, Canada, also is available on the For The Media website.
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.3487)
Editor’s Note: Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding author Talia Puzantian, Pharm.D., BCPP, email Ivan Alber at ialber@kgi.edu. To contact corresponding author Kirk E. Evoy, Pharm.D., BCACP, BC-ADM, CTTS, email Nick Nobel at nobel@utexas.edu. The full studies are available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to these studies in your story? Links will be live at the embargo time
Puzantian study: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.2018.12291
Evoy study: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.2018.15892
Bottom Line: Two studies looked at the availability of naloxone, an antidote for opioid overdoses, from pharmacies in two states that have passed legislation to allow pharmacists to dispense the medication without a physician’s prescription.
What: Having access to naloxone can reduce the risk of death from an opioid overdose. Legislation in California has allowed trained pharmacists to provide naloxone without a physician’s prescription since 2016. In this study, an anonymous telephone survey of some California community pharmacies was conducted in 2018 with interviewers posing as potential customers who asked pharmacy staff if they could get naloxone without a prescription. Less than 25 percent of about 1,150 retail pharmacies said they were giving naloxone to patients without a physician prescription. Of the pharmacies providing the medication, only about 50 percent had nasal naloxone in stock. Limitations of the study include a lack of data on the reasons why pharmacies weren’t providing the naloxone.
Authors: Talia Puzantian, Pharm.D., BCPP, Keck Graduate Institute School of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Claremont, California, and James J. Gasper, Pharm.D., BCPP, University of California, San Francisco
(doi:10.1001/jama.2018.12291)
What: A second study evaluated naloxone accessibility from chain pharmacies in Texas under a standing order from prescribers almost three years after Texas enacted legislation. Under a standing order, prescribers may authorize pharmacists to dispense naloxone without a prescription. In this study, interviewers posed as customers and spoke to pharmacists about wanting to purchase naloxone to have on hand in the event they had to respond to an opioid overdose. Among about 2,300 pharmacies, 84 percent indicated they would dispense the naloxone and 69 percent of pharmacies had the medication in stock. The study was limited by interviewing only one pharmacist per pharmacy and including only Texas chain pharmacies.
Authors: Kirk E. Evoy, Pharm.D., BCACP, BC-ADM, CTTS, the University of Texas at Austin, and coauthors
(doi:10.1001/jama.2018.15892)
Related Material: The editorial, “Overcoming Inertia to Improve Medication Use and Deprescribing,” by Michael A. Steinman, M.D., University of California San Francisco, California, and C. Seth Landefeld, M.D., University of Alabama at Birmingham, is available on the For The Media website.
To Learn More: The full studies are available on the For The Media website.
Editor’s Note: Please see the articles for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 8 A.M. (ET), MONDAY, NOVEMBER 12, 2018
Media advisory: To contact co-author Katrina L. Piercy, Ph.D., R.D., email Frances Bevington at Frances.Bevington@hhs.gov. The article is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this report in your story? Link will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.2018.14854
Bottom Line: Updated physical activity guidelines released by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) tell Americans to get moving, and for how long, with aerobic and muscle-strengthening activities.
Background: Most adults and adolescents in the United States aren’t active enough, although being physically active is one of the most important things people can do to improve their health and reduce their risk for many chronic diseases and conditions.
Who and When: These updated Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans are based on a review of the current science on physical activity and health.
Key Recommendations:
Conclusions: Health professionals and policymakers should promote awareness of the updated guidelines and support efforts to implement programs, practices and policies to facilitate increased physical activity to improve the health of the U.S. population.
Authors: Katrina L. Piercy, Ph.D., R.D., U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Rockville, Maryland, and coauthors
Related Material
The following related elements from The JAMA Network are also available on the For The Media website:
— A summary video is available to view on this page and to embed on your website by copying and pasting the HTML code below. To download the video, email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org for information.
— The JAMA editorial, “New Physical Activity Guidelines – A Call to Activity for Clinicians and Patients,” by Paul D. Thompson, M.D., Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, and Thijs M. H. Eijsvogels, Ph.D., Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
— The JAMA Viewpoint, “Physical Activity Guidelines for Health and Prosperity in the United States,” by Brett P. Giroir, M.D., and Don Wright, M.D., M.P.H., U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Editor’s Note: These guidelines will be presented at the American Heart Association Scientific Sessions 2018 on Monday, November 12.
Editor’s Note: The article contains funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
Video embed code:
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), MONDAY, NOVEMBER 12, 2018
Media advisory: To contact author Brian T. Bateman, M.D., M.Sc., email Elaine St. Peter at estpeter@partners.org. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? Link will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.3668
Bottom Line: Prescription opioids dispensed to children and adolescents have steadily decreased since 2012 in an analysis of data from a large commercial insurance provider. The analysis include all oral opioids used for pain, excluding cough suppressants, and individuals with a health care claim associated with a cancer diagnosis were excluded. In 2004, an average of 3 of every 1,00 children and adolescents received an outpatient opioid prescription in a given month and that increased to 4 per 1,000 between 2009 to 2012 before dropping to 2 of every 1,000 children and adolescents in a given month at the start of 2017. The trend in long-term opioid prescription use (three or more consecutive months) also similarly declined. Data for this analysis came only from a single large commercial insurance provider, and opioid dispensing rates may differ in other populations and settings.
Authors: Brian T. Bateman, M.D., M.Sc., Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, and coauthors
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.3668)
Editor’s Note: The article includes funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), MONDAY, NOVEMBER 12, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding author Steven A. Sumner, M.D., M.Sc., email Courtney Lenard at zvq5@cdc.gov. The full studies are available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to these studies in your story? Links will be live at the embargo time: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5139
Bottom Line: This research letter suggests that combining hospital and police data might provide a more complete picture of violence in a community because some hospital-treated injuries result from violent incidents unreported to police. Nurses at an emergency department in Atlanta collected information on violent injuries that happened in public places as part of a surveillance system set up for a violence prevention program. The incidents were mapped and researchers sought to assess the percentage of violent injuries treated in the emergency department from incidents unknown to law enforcement. Emergency department screening identified 1,654 violent injuries with 1,122 of them happening in public and a large percentage unreported to police. Limitations of the study include that its findings come from only one city and its focus was on only violence in public places.
Authors: Steven A. Sumner, M.D., M.Sc., of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, and coauthors
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5139)
Editor’s Note: The article contains funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), MONDAY, NOVEMBER 12, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding author Mikel Izquierdo, Ph.D., email mikel.izquierdo@gmail.com. The full studies are available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to these studies in your story? Links will be live at the embargo time: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4869
Bottom Line: A randomized clinical trial in Spain that included 370 hospitalized patients 75 or older showed an exercise intervention was effective at helping to reverse the functional decline associated with hospitalization for older patients. The exercise intervention, which included two daily sessions of moderate-intensity resistance, balance and walking exercises, was compared with usual care in the hospital, which included physical rehabilitation when it was needed. The exercise intervention group showed improvement on functional capacity scales at hospital discharge, as well as benefits from at the intervention on other endpoints indicative of cognitive status. Limitations of the study include not collecting functional and cognitive data before the acute illness that landed patients in the hospital.
Authors: Mikel Izquierdo, Ph.D, of the Public University of Navarra, Spain, and coauthors
Related Material: The invited commentary, “A Novel Exercise Intervention and Functional Status in Very Elderly Patients During Acute Hospitalization,” by William J. Hall, M.D., M.A.C.P., of the University of Rochester School of Medicine & Dentistry, Rochester, New York., also is available on the For The Media website.
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Video embed code:
(doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4869)
Editor’s Note: The article contains funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
A Visual Abstract is available below for the JAMA Network Open study, “Temporal Trends in the Use of Therapeutic Hypothermia for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest,” by Steven M. Bradley, M.D., M.P.H., Minneapolis Heart Institute, Minneapolis, and coauthors.
This is the link to the abstract when the embargo lifts.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 2018
Media advisory: To contact the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, email the Media Coordinator at Newsroom@USPSTF.net or call 202-572-2044. The full report is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this report in your story? Link will be live at the embargo time and all links to all USPSTF articles remain free indefinitely: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.2018.16789
Bottom Line: The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends screening adults 18 and older, including pregnant women, for unhealthy alcohol use in primary care settings. Those patients who engage in risky or hazardous drinking should be offered brief behavioral counseling interventions to reduce unhealthy alcohol use. The USPSTF also concludes the evidence is insufficient regarding screening for alcohol use in adolescents 12 to 17 in primary care settings.
Background: The USPSTF routinely makes recommendations about the effectiveness of preventive care services. This latest statement is an update of its 2013 recommendation on screening for unhealthy alcohol use in primary care settings. Excessive alcohol use is one of the most common causes of premature death in the United States, with an estimated 88,000 deaths attributed to alcohol occurring annually in the United States from 2006 to 2010. Alcohol use during pregnancy is also one of the major preventable causes of birth defects and developmental disabilities.
The USPSTF Concludes:
Related Material
The following related elements from The JAMA Network are also available on the For The Media website:
— An interview with Susan J. Curry, Ph.D., co-author of the recommendation statement.
— Screening and Behavioral Counseling Interventions to Reduce Unhealthy Alcohol Use in Adolescents and Adults – U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
— Screening and Behavioral Counseling Interventions to Reduce Unhealthy Alcohol Use in Adolescents and Adults – Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force
— JAMA editorial: Screening for Unhealthy Alcohol Use
— JAMA Internal Medicine editorial: Unhealthy Alcohol Use in Primary Care – The Elephant in the Examination Room
— JAMA Psychiatry editorial: Screening and Brief Behavioral Counseling Interventions to Reduce Unhealthy Alcohol Use in Adults 18 Years and Older, Including Pregnant Women
— JAMA Pediatrics editorial: Alcohol Use Screening and Behavioral Counseling With Adolescents in Primary Care
— JAMA Patient Page: Screening and Counseling to Reduce Unhealthy Alcohol Use
To Learn More: The full report is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jama.2018.16789)
Editor’s Note: Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
Note: More information about the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, its process, and its recommendations can be found on the newsroom page of its website.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 9, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding study author Janna A. Dickenson, Ph.D., email at Krystle Barbour at kbarbour@umn.edu. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story?: Links will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.4468
About JAMA Network Open: JAMA Network Open is the new online-only open access general medical journal from the JAMA Network. Every Friday, the journal publishes peer-reviewed clinical research and commentary in more than 40 medical and health subject areas. Every article is free online from the day of publication.
Bottom Line: About 10 percent of men and 7 percent of women reported significant levels of distress and social impairment associated with difficulty controlling their sexual feelings, urges and behaviors.
Why The Research Is Interesting: Compulsive sexual behavior disorder (CSBD) is a persistent pattern of failure in controlling intense sexual urges that can result in distress and social impairment. Assessing how common such distress and social impairment are can help to provide the closest estimate of CSBD in the population considering a lack of previous studies and debate around specific symptom presentation and definitions with regard to hypersexuality.
Who and When: 2,325 adults between 18 and 50 who participated in the National Survey of Sexual Health and Behavior and who were randomly sampled nationwide in November 2016
What (Study Measures and Outcomes): Distress and impairment associated with difficulty controlling sexual feelings, urges and behaviors as measured by a screening tool
How (Study Design): This was a survey study.
Authors: Janna A. Dickenson, Ph.D., University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, and coauthors
Results: Of the 2,325 adults, 201 (8.6 percent overall or 10.3 percent of men and 7 percent of women) met the criteria for clinically relevant levels of distress, impairment or both associated with difficulty controlling their sexual feelings, urges and behaviors.
Study Limitations: The behavior screening tool may not always be accurate and the survey didn’t assess additional causes of distress about participants’ sexual behavior.
Study Conclusions:
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.4468)
Editor’s Note: The article contains conflict of interest and funding support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding author Nicholas S. Reed, Au.D., email Raigan Wheeler at rwheel13@jhmi.edu. To contact corresponding author Jennifer A. Deal, Ph.D., email Barbara Benham at bbenham1@jhu.edu. The full studies are available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to these studies in your story? Links will be live at the embargo time
Reed study: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaotolaryngology/fullarticle/10.1001/jamaoto.2018.2875
Deal study: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaotolaryngology/fullarticle/10.1001/jamaoto.2018.2876
Bottom Line: Two studies and two commentaries examine the association of untreated hearing loss with health care use, costs and other health conditions.
What: More than 38 million adults in the United States experience hearing loss; however, fewer than 20 percent report using hearing aids. In one study, researchers examined health care use and costs over 10 years among about 4,700 adults 50 and older with and without untreated hearing loss who were included in a health insurance database. Researchers report untreated hearing loss was associated with more hospitalizations, increased risk of 30-day hospital readmission, increased risk of emergency department visits and longer hospital stays. Over a 10-year period, people with untreated hearing loss incurred an average of $22,000 more in health care costs than people without hearing loss. Limitations of the study are inherent to using claims data, including data coding processes designed for billing not research.
Authors: Nicholas S. Reed, Au.D., Johns Hopkins School of Medicine. Baltimore, and coauthors
(doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2018.2875)
What: Another data analysis of the same group of adults examined the association between a diagnosis of hearing loss and other health conditions. Researchers report hearing loss was associated with an increased 10-year risk of a range of health conditions, including dementia, depression, falls and heart attack. More studies are needed to understand the reasons underlying these associations and whether treatment for hearing loss might reduce risk for these conditions.
Authors: Jennifer A. Deal, Ph.D., Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, and coauthors
(doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2018.2876)
Related Material Also available on the For The Media website:
— An interview with Nicholas S. Reed, Au.D, co-author of “Trends in Health Care Costs and Utilization Associated With Untreated Hearing Loss Over 10 Years.”
— The commentaries, “The Invisible Costs of Hearing Loss,” by Michael M. McKee, M.D., M.P.H., University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, and “Association of Age-Related Hearing Loss With Multiple Adverse Health Outcomes,” by David Loughrey, Ph.D., University of California San Francisco, and Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.
To Learn More: The full studies are available on the For The Media website.
Editor’s Note: Please see the articles for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding author Joceline Vu, M.D., email Kara Gavin at kegavin@med.umich.edu. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? Link will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/fullarticle/10.1001/jamasurg.2018.4234
Bottom Line: Changing how opioids are prescribed after surgery requires understanding the factors associated with patients’ use of the pain-relieving medications. This study describes opioid prescribing and use after surgery among almost 2,400 patients in Michigan who underwent 1 of 12 surgical procedures in 2017. Overall, more opioids were prescribed than used, with patients using about 27 percent of the opioids prescribed. The size of an opioid prescription was associated with opioid use, with patients using an additional five pills for every 10 extra pills prescribed. The study is limited by data that relied on patients’ recollections of how many pills they used, which may not be accurate.
Authors: Joceline Vu, M.D., University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, and coauthors
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2018.4234)
Editor’s Note: The article includes funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding author Yuichiro Yano, M.D., Ph.D., email Sarah Avery at sarah.avery@duke.edu. To contact corresponding author Sang Min Park, M.D., Ph.D., M.P.H., email smpark.snuh@gmail.com. The full studies are available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to these studies in your story? Links will be live at the embargo time
Yano study: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.2018.13551
Park study: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.2018.16501
Bottom Line: Two studies and two editorials examine the relationship between having high blood pressure as an adult younger than 40 and increased risk of later cardiovascular disease events.
What: In one study, about 4,800 African American and white adults had blood pressure measurements taken before age 40. Adults with elevated blood pressure (systolic blood pressure [SBP] of 120 to 129 mm Hg; diastolic blood pressure [DBP] less than 80 mm Hg), stage 1 hypertension (SBP of 130 to 139 mm Hg; DBP of 80 to 89 mm Hg) or stage 2 hypertension (SBP of 140 mm Hg or greater; DBP of 90 mm Hg or greater) before age 40 had an associated higher risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) events such as fatal and nonfatal coronary heart disease, heart failure or stroke compared with adults who had normal blood pressure during a follow-up of about 19 years. The blood pressure classification in the new guidelines from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association may help identify young adults at higher risk for cardiovascular disease events.
Authors: Yuichiro Yano, M.D., Ph.D., Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, and coauthors
(doi:10.1001/jama.2018.13551)
What: A second study included data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service for about 2.5 million adults between the ages of 20 and 39 who had a blood pressure measurements taken over four years and who were followed up over another 10 years for CVD (defined as two or more days of hospitalization due to CVD or death due to CVD). Researchers report that adults with stage 1 or 2 hypertension before age 40 had an increased risk of subsequent CVD compared with adults with normal blood pressure. The study population was from a single country so the results may not be generalizable to others.
Authors: Sang Min Park, M.D., Ph.D., M.P.H., Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea, and coauthors
(doi:10.1001/jama.2018.16501)
Related Material: The editorials, “High Blood Pressure in Young Adulthood and Risk of Premature Cardiovascular Disease,” by Ramachandran S. Vasan, M.D., Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, and “Hypertension—A Public Health Challenge of Global Proportions,” by Naomi D. L. Fisher, M.D., Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, and Gregory Curfman, M.D., Deputy Editor, JAMA, also are available on the For The Media website.
To Learn More: The full studies are available on the For The Media website.
Editor’s Note: Please see the articles for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
Within the last 2 years, major guidelines have been issued from U.S.-based and European organizations that differ in their recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension. In this podcast, experts from both sides of the Atlantic—Paul Whelton, M.D., from the United States (Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana) and Bryan Williams, M.D., from Europe (University College London in England)—discuss the similarities and differences in these guidelines and the basis for the differences. They were interviewed by JAMA editors Greg Curfman, M.D., and Ed Livingston, M.D.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 2018
Media advisory: To contact corresponding author Barry A. Borlaug, M.D., email Traci Klein at newsbureau@mayo.edu. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? Link will be live at the embargo time: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.2018.14852
Bottom Line: About half of patients with heart failure have a form of the condition with normal pump function that is called heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. This form of heart failure is characterized by symptoms such as fatigue, shortness of breath and difficulty being physically active. This randomized clinical trial of 105 patients with this kind of heart failure examined the effects on exercise capacity after four weeks of inhaled, nebulized inorganic nitrite compared with placebo. Researchers report the treatment wasn’t effective compared with placebo for improving exercise capacity in patients.
Authors: Barry A. Borlaug, M.D., Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota, and coauthors
Visual Abstract: This is the link to the abstract when the embargo lifts.
Related Material: The editorial, “Hypertension—A Public Health Challenge of Global Proportions,” by Naomi D. L. Fisher, M.D., Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, and Gregory Curfman, M.D., Deputy Editor, JAMA, is available on the For The Media website.
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jama.2018.14852)
Editor’s Note: Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), MONDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 2018
Media advisory: To contact author James D. O’Leary, M.D., email Jessamine Luck at jessamine.luck@sickkids.ca. The full study is available on the For The Media website.
Want to embed a link to this study in your story? Link will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.3662
Bottom Line: Surgery under general anesthesia for young children before they started elementary school wasn’t associated with increased risk of adverse child development outcomes compared with their biological siblings who didn’t have surgery and after accounting for other potential biological and environmental factors. The study of children in Ontario, Canada, included 2,346 sibling pairs where only one sibling had surgery. Child development outcomes were based on a measure used to assess children’s readiness to learn in five areas (physical health and well-being, social knowledge and competence, emotional health and maturity, language and cognitive development, and communication skills and general knowledge). Most children in the study group had a single uncomplicated surgical procedure so the study findings may not be generalizable to children who had lengthy or repeat procedures.
Authors: James D. O’Leary, M.D., of the Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), Toronto, Canada, and coauthors
To Learn More: The full study is available on the For The Media website.
(doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.3662)
Editor’s Note: The article includes funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email mediarelations@jamanetwork.org.