Original Investigation

Food Insecurity Interventions to Improve Blood Pressure

JAMA Internal Medicine 10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.5287

October 13, 2025 at 11:00 AM EDT

Read the full article

When designing a food insecurity intervention to improve blood pressure, does a food subsidy lead to better control than a food box; does the offer of lifestyle counseling improve outcomes relative to not offering lifestyle counseling; and does longer duration of intervention improve outcomes relative to shorter duration?In this randomized comparative effectiveness trial including 458 participants, a food subsidy produced better blood pressure control than a delivered food box. Offering lifestyle counseling and a longer benefit duration did not produce better blood pressure outcomes.A food subsidy improved blood pressure control compared with a food box, but offering lifestyle counseling or longer intervention duration did not lead to better outcomes.

Corresponding Author: Seth A. Berkowitz, MD, MPH, Division of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, 5034 Old Clinic Bldg, CB# 7110, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 (seth_berkowitz@med.unc.edu).

Link to the article in your story

We encourage you to link out to this article in your story using the link below. It includes an access token that will give free access to the article for your readers up to one year after publication. (The link will be live after the article publishes and embargo is lifted.)

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.5287?utm_source=for_the_media&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=ftm_links&utm_term=101325

Please see the article for additional information, including full author list, author contributions and affiliations, conflict of interest and financial disclosures, and funding and support.

Need more information? Contact us.

Editor's Picks