Original Investigation

An AI-Powered Lifestyle Intervention vs Human Coaching in the Diabetes Prevention Program

JAMA 10.1001/jama.2025.19563

October 27, 2025 at 11:05 AM EDT

Read the full article

How does referral to a lifestyle intervention exclusively driven by artificial intelligence (AI) compare with referral to a human coach–led Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) lifestyle intervention?In this randomized clinical trial involving 368 adults with overweight or obesity and prediabetes, 31.7% of participants randomized to referral to an AI-led DPP and 31.9% of participants randomized to referral to a human-led DPP group achieved the primary composite outcome (5% weight loss, 4% weight loss plus 150 minutes of physical activity per week, or an absolute hemoglobin A reduction of ≥0.2 percentage points with hemoglobin A maintained at <6.5% throughout the study duration) at 12 months, a difference that met the prespecified noninferiority criterion of 15%.Among adults with prediabetes and overweight or obesity, a fully automated AI-led DPP may be a viable alternative to a DPP led by human coaches.

Corresponding Author: Nestoras Mathioudakis, MD, MHS, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes nmathio1@jh.edu).

Link to the article in your story

We encourage you to link out to this article in your story using the link below. It includes an access token that will give free access to the article for your readers up to one year after publication. (The link will be live after the article publishes and embargo is lifted.)

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.2025.19563?utm_source=for_the_media&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=ftm_links&utm_term=102725

Please see the article for additional information, including full author list, author contributions and affiliations, conflict of interest and financial disclosures, and funding and support.

Need more information? Contact us.

Editor's Picks