Biofeedback vs Respiratory Retraining for Inducible Laryngeal Obstruction
JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery 10.1001/jamaoto.2025.4542December 11, 2025 at 11:00 AM EST
How does video biofeedback compare with respiratory retraining therapy (RRT) in the treatment of inducible laryngeal obstruction (ILO)?In this randomized clinical trial including 54 participants, the mean (SD) change in Dyspnea Index scores at 1 month posttreatment was −3.54 (4.75) points for the biofeedback group and −4.15 (4.44) points for the RRT group. There was no difference between the 2 treatment groups.Video biofeedback was not different from RRT in treatment of ILO, and its use may present advantages in certain patient populations.
Link to the article in your story
We encourage you to link out to this article in your story using the link below. It includes an access token that will give free access to the article for your readers up to one year after publication. (The link will be live after the article publishes and embargo is lifted.)
Please see the article for additional information, including full author list, author contributions and affiliations, conflict of interest and financial disclosures, and funding and support.
Need more information? Contact us.