Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Duration in Patients at High Bleeding Risk
JAMA Cardiology 10.1001/jamacardio.2026.1922June 24, 2026 at 11:00 AM EDT
Among patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), is an abbreviated dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) regimen safer and as effective as standard DAPT duration?In this systematic review and meta-analysis of 14 randomized clinical trials, including 11 398 patients at HBR, abbreviated DAPT (1-month to 3-month) was associated with significantly lower bleeding risk compared with standard DAPT (6-month to 12-month). In comparisons with standard DAPT, abbreviated regimens were not associated with an increase in major adverse cardiovascular events, and an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events was observed with 1 vs 3 months of DAPT in the single trial comparing these 2 regimens, but the network estimate was nonsignificant.In this meta-analysis, abbreviated DAPT was associated with less bleeding and, at least for 3-month regimens, was not associated with an increase in ischemic risk in patients at HBR undergoing PCI.
Link to the article in your story
We encourage you to link out to this article in your story using the link below. It includes an access token that will give free access to the article for your readers up to one year after publication. (The link will be live after the article publishes and embargo is lifted.)
Please see the article for additional information, including full author list, author contributions and affiliations, conflict of interest and financial disclosures, and funding and support.
Need more information? Contact us.