EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), TUESDAY, MAY 14, 2019
Media advisory: To contact corresponding author Christina A. Roberto, Ph.D., email Katie Delach at Katie.Delach@pennmedicine.upenn.edu. The full study and editorial are linked to this news release.
Embed this link to provide your readers free access to the full-text article: This link will be live at the embargo time https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2733208?guestAccessKey=86610f39-a0eb-46d4-a30a-3ddef0036408&utm_source=For_The_Media&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=ftm_links&utm_content=tfl&utm_term=051419
Bottom Line: A few U.S. cities have instituted beverage taxes on sweetened drinks to generate revenue and to reduce consumption of these drinks because of their association with obesity and poor health. This study looked at changes in beverage prices and sales before and after Philadelphia implemented such a tax (1.5 cents per ounce) in 2017 compared with Baltimore, which had no such tax. In an analysis that included nearly 300 stores, study authors report Philadelphia’s tax was associated with increased beverage prices and large sales declines, which were partially offset by increased purchases in neighboring areas. This study relied on data for beverages sold only at chain retailers.
Authors: Christina A. Roberto, Ph.D., University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, and coauthors
Editor’s Note: The article includes conflict of interest and funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email firstname.lastname@example.org.