EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 11 A.M. (ET), WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 4, 2015
Media Advisory: To contact corresponding author Torsten Olbers, M.D., Ph.D., email email@example.com. To contact corresponding commentary author Justin B. Dimick, M.D., M.P.H., call Shantell Kirkendoll at 734-764-2220 or email firstname.lastname@example.org.
To place an electronic embedded link to this study in your story: Links will be live at the embargo time: http://archsurg.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/jamasurg.2014.3579 and http://archsurg.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/jamasurg.2014.3585.
The bariatric surgical procedure biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch resulted in more weight loss and better improvement in blood lipids and glucose five years after surgery compared with usual gastric bypass surgery but duodenal switch was associated with more long-term surgical and nutritional complications and more adverse gastrointestinal effects, according to a report published online by JAMA Surgery.
Duodenal switch and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass are surgical procedures used to treat severe obesity, although there is no consensus on the preferred procedure.
The article by Hilde Risstad, M.D., of Oslo University Hospital, Norway, and coauthors reports on the five-year outcomes from a clinical trial that included 60 patients between the ages of 20 and 50 with a body mass index (BMI) of 50 to 60 (31 underwent gastric bypass and 29 underwent duodenal switch).
Five years after surgery, the average reductions in BMI were 13.6 after gastric bypass and 22.1 after duodenal switch, according to study results. Remission rates of type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, changes in blood pressure and lung function were similar between the two groups. However, reductions in total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides and fasting glucose were greater after duodenal switch compared with gastric bypass. Health-related quality of life was similar for both groups but nutritional complications and adverse gastrointestinal effects were more common with duodenal switch. Patients who underwent duodenal switch also had more surgical procedures related to the initial procedure and more hospital admissions compared with patients who underwent gastric bypass.
“We recommend that duodenal switch be used with caution owing to a higher rate of additional surgical procedures and risk of nutritional complications,” the authors conclude.
(JAMA Surgery. Published online February 4, 2015. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2014.3579. Available pre-embargo to the media at http://media.jamanetwork.com.)
Editor’s Note: Authors made conflict of interest and funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
Commentary: Weighing the Risks, Benefits of Bariatric Surgery
In a related commentary, Oliver A. Varban, M.D., and Justin B. Dimick, M.D., M.P.H., of the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, write: “Given the high complication rates of duodenal switch in the study by Risstad et al, it is difficult to recommend duodenal switch as a first-line weight loss procedure. At the very least, patients seeking this procedure should receive ample warning regarding the very high risks of adverse nutritional outcomes and the high reoperation rate. Patients with poor compliance and poor follow-up should not be offered this procedure because they could be at risk of fatal complications if postoperative problems are not addressed in a timely fashion.”
(JAMA Surgery. Published online February 4, 2015. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2014.3585. Available pre-embargo to the media at http://media.jamanetwork.com.)
Editor’s Note: An author made conflict of interest and funding/support disclosures. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
# # #
For more information, contact JAMA Network Media Relations at 312-464-JAMA (5262) or email email@example.com.